Do you train for hand-to-hand?

Yes, I'm over 55.
Yes, I've trained in "hand-2-hand", which was used to some extent daily until I completely retired from cop-work 2 months ago.
Now, training mainly consists of staying in shape (weight control; regular cardio exercise program).
Luckily, my experience goes back ~40 years, however, in karate and kung-fu. I don't have advice for someone just starting out other than to just get what training you can or desire. Otherwise, consider some other non-lethal weapons too, such as, pepper-spray or some form of impact weapons (which can still benefit from actual training, however).

I still shoot regularly, often several times per week. All this makes for a busy-enough retired life.
 
This thread is over three years old. When it was still pretty new I posted that my age and physical limitations made running or fighting impossible (running) or impractical (fighting).

Now in a few weeks I'll be eighty. In addition to stage 3 COPD (no, I stopped smoking twenty-five years ago) I've developed three kinds of heart trouble. I have to use a four-wheel walker; my cane is no longer sufficient.

I'm pretty sure my situation is not unique on this forum.

I get out far less these days. I never go to bars, or knowingly visit high crime areas. But wherever I go, I am easy pickings for the kind of lowlife piece of excrement who likes to rob and/or beat the goo out of frail geezers.

Even more than when I posted here three and a half years ago, if I'm attacked my priority will be positioning myself so that my gun can be deployed. I pray it won't be necessary, but if it is that will be Job One.

I'm not ready to check out or be turned into a turnip. Not just yet. I'm afraid I would miss something interesting.
 
If you were the target of a sucker punch in someone's "knock out game", would you not try to evade or parry the blow rather than just receive it and immediately go for the gun?

Hopefully we're not going to get caught up debating the precise definition of a sucker punch.
No, not debating the definition. The point is, if it's a sucker punch, you won't see it coming. Therefore, you won't be able to evade or parry.
 
...if I'm attacked my priority will be positioning myself so that my gun can be deployed. I pray it won't be necessary, but if it is that will be Job One.
I think this is key.

You are not alone, but neither are you defenseless. I don't think anyone on this thread expects anyone to be Jackie Chan. At least I don't. My philosophy is that you need to put some thought into empty hand defense even if it's only to position yourself to get your gun out.

It's really about awareness and proximity. If I can keep the bad guy at a decent distance, I greatly increase my chances of winning the altercation. If I can't keep that distance, how can I make some distance?

The point here is, just having the gun isn't enough. You have to be able to deploy it when it's needed. The fact that a person can stand and move around tells me that they can do something. It might not be pretty, but there is always something.
 
No, not debating the definition. The point is, if it's a sucker punch, you won't see it coming. Therefore, you won't be able to evade or parry.

Actually you are. Textbook definition of a sucker punch is an unexpected punch or strike. That in no way indicates to me that it cannot be defended. Irregardless of what it means to you, most schools do teach sucker punch defense and usually differentiate between it coming from the front, side or from the rear. Debating semantics doesn't have any value.
 
I guess that I would like to direct this question primarily to the older guys like me that routinely carry. I'll define "older" as over 55. Younger guys can feel free to chime in too especially if you have specific knowledge or experience in self defense training (you there Rastoff?)

Everything I've ever read says that you are much more likely to be involved in a close quarters physical altercation than a gun fight, which makes sense. It also makes sense that you can't just shoot unarmed assailants and not expect serious consequences. We are generally urged to train for this sort of combat if we undertake the responsibility of carrying a firearm. As I've aged a bit and developed typical aging changes (mild back issues, some shoulder issues, maybe heart, etc) I simply am unable to realistically train in Ju Jitsu, Krav Maga, or similar disciplines the way I maybe could have in the past. And I realize it will only get worse in the coming years. I can still effectively train with a firearm however. We all carry to defend ourselves and to be prepared, but my concern is I feel a nagging sense of being ill-prepared in this area. I stay in reasonably good shape and intend to continue to; maybe I could hold my own against some younger guys, but the effects of aging can't be stopped, and my fist-fighting days are dwindling fast! Obviously the biggest advantage of aging is wisdom and patience...ie being smart enough to avoid fist fights, but some unarmed attacks may not be avoidable.

So the question for some of you fellow mature guys is do you train for physical altercations,
if so how? Any recommendations? General thoughts on the subject?
Thanks in advance!

I am a 61-year-old handicapped USN Vietnam veteran. My Glock 17 is loaded and ready for all altercations range 0-100 yards. My numb right leg makes me vulnerable to hand-to-hand stuff, so I'll just shoot him/her.
 
to answer the question .. many of us older people ( I'm 67) have more ailments that limit mobility and ability to fight off an aggressor in a hand to hand combat situation ..

COPD a lump together of all breathing ailments with no cure affects 10 million of us with 70% over the age of 45 .. many don't realize how bad it is effecting them till it reaches stage II of III stages and they are in their late 50's and older .. would limit any one with it from running away .. many with COPD are on O2 and lug around a tank or O2 concentrator ..

many of us have ailments that they are unaware of .. such as 4-6% of the male population that has smoked have abdominal aorta aneurysms of various size that if they were hit in the abdomen could rupture .. many families don't find out their loved one has one till it is the cause of death !! I've lost 2 friends with one in the past 10 years .. one while surgeon's were trying to repair it .. Rupture of the AAA occurs in 1–3% of men aged 65 or more, the mortality is 70–95%

High blood pressure and other heart ailments can make it harder for the older population to do any kind of exertion that would raise their heart rate .. pace makers, stints and other electronic devices are implanted for heart conditions that would have killed you just 15 to 20 years ago !!

The list of ailments the elderly have is quite long .. I could go on but won't .

An instructor I took a class from told an elderly man that in some cases it might be best to fight from your back lying on the ground fending off an attack with your feet till you could draw your weapon .. instead of trying to run and being attacked from behind or standing taking punches to the head or body !!
 
An instructor I took a class from told an elderly man that in some cases it might be best to fight from your back lying on the ground fending off an attack with your feet till you could draw your weapon .. instead of trying to run and being attacked from behind or standing taking punches to the head or body !!
This is, and always has been, my point. There is always something you can do.

People make claims that they cannot fight. That simply isn't true. What Whitwabit said is true, there are plenty of people who can't afford to raise their heart beat or stress level on a regular basis. Even so, that doesn't mean they are completely helpless.

What it does mean, is that they need to learn alternate means of defense. Laying on your back and kicking could be one such method. Since I don't know what ailments everyone reading this has, I can't suggest methodologies. It would take too long. But, you can find a self-defense instructor in your area and work with them. Any self-defense instructor worth their salt should be able to guide you in alternate methods.
 
I train 4 or 5 days each week. I go full contact on Thursdays.
I'm big and easy to hit.
I hit back real good.
I turned 61 this year.
I test this spring for 4th Dan.
I ain't stoppin'
I ain't givin' up.

May I presume you have that 4th Dan and are now working toward "Master" level? (5th Dan)
 
I'm too old to run (not that I would), lost some speed due to bad knees and back to mess with hand to hand. Plus I don't want to get all sweaty. That's why I bought a hand gun.
 
When I was a military cop I only had two moves when my charm failed. Move One was to hit the offending party in the face or forehead with my radio. Those of you who remember the old Motorola brick can imagine the effect when it was swung lustily enough. I would then gracefully transition to Move Two, which was a rear chokehold, also applied with vigor. If I could maneuver myself behind him first, I would just go directly to Move Two.

These two moves were viewed with favor at the time. I once was enthusiastically choking out a hardheaded young brawler at the entrance to the NCO Club when my soon-to-be bride walked out with some friends from her office. Hi, honey, said she. Hi, dear, said I. Grrrrrkkkkkllllllkkaakkk, said my new friend. She stills laughs about it.

Sadly, such antics are frowned upon today. Radios are tiny things, and necks have grown weak and collapsible. In later years we just resorted to the law enforcement dog pile, which is quite the bonding experience but led to me getting hurt more often by flailing arms, legs, and handcuffs.

Then tasers brought the fun back, but I was never issued one.

Now as a semi-retired gentleman of leisure I use common sense, my considerable charm, foul language, and a gun, in that order. (Though I am thinking about carrying around an old Motorola, just for old time's sake.)
 
Last edited:
I am going out to the range now to practice with my S&W 629 with my WC bowling-pin loads. The next match is on Sat 28Oct2017.
 
Reminds me...

...of my crime fighting career. 😳 One 'dogpile' stands out, for certain. We were fighting a BIG guy on PCP or some other drug that made him immune to pain (at the moment) and quite impossible to control. Eventually there was a moment when it was likely we could get the cuffs on him and someone said: 'Cuff him' as all of us reached for ours. 'Course he was thereupon loose...and the battle started anew. :eek:

It ended relatively well for all involved...including the BIG dude. Lotsa uniform items needed replacement, though. :D

For those not in LE or fighters, you cannot 'win' if you can't hurt your adversary. And LE is a contact sport, absolutely.

Be safe.



When I was a military cop I only had two moves when my charm failed. Move One was to hit the offending party in the face or forehead with my radio. Those of you who remember the old Motorola brick can imagine the effect when it was swung lustily enough. I would then gracefully transition to Move Two, which was a rear chokehold, also applied with vigor. If I could maneuver myself behind him first, I would just go directly to Move Two.

These two moves were viewed with favor at the time. I once was enthusiastically choking out a hardheaded young brawler at the entrance to the NCO Club when my soon-to-be bride walked out with some friends from her office. Hi, honey, said she. Hi, dear, said I. Grrrrrkkkkkllllllkkaakkk, said my new friend. She stills laughs about it.

Sadly, such antics are frowned upon today. Radios are tiny things, and necks have grown weak and collapsible. In later years we just resorted to the law enforcement dog pile, which is quite the bonding experience but led to me getting hurt more often by flailing arms, legs, and handcuffs.

Then tasers brought the fun back, but I was never issued one.

Now as a semi-retired gentleman of leisure I use common sense, my considerable charm, foul language, and a gun, in that order. (Though I am thinking about carrying around an old Motorola, just for old time's sake.)
 
I guess that I would like to direct this question primarily to the older guys like me that routinely carry. I'll define "older" as over 55. Younger guys can feel free to chime in too especially if you have specific knowledge or experience in self defense training (you there Rastoff?)

Everything I've ever read says that you are much more likely to be involved in a close quarters physical altercation than a gun fight, which makes sense. It also makes sense that you can't just shoot unarmed assailants and not expect serious consequences. We are generally urged to train for this sort of combat if we undertake the responsibility of carrying a firearm. As I've aged a bit and developed typical aging changes (mild back issues, some shoulder issues, maybe heart, etc) I simply am unable to realistically train in Ju Jitsu, Krav Maga, or similar disciplines the way I maybe could have in the past. And I realize it will only get worse in the coming years. I can still effectively train with a firearm however. We all carry to defend ourselves and to be prepared, but my concern is I feel a nagging sense of being ill-prepared in this area. I stay in reasonably good shape and intend to continue to; maybe I could hold my own against some younger guys, but the effects of aging can't be stopped, and my fist-fighting days are dwindling fast! Obviously the biggest advantage of aging is wisdom and patience...ie being smart enough to avoid fist fights, but some unarmed attacks may not be avoidable.

So the question for some of you fellow mature guys is do you train for physical altercations, and if so how? Any recommendations? General thoughts on the subject?
Thanks in advance!


I know what to do. I taught it at one time. Heck even put it to practice a time or two........However, those days were 35 - 40 years ago. Nowadays I steer clear of those areas. If I have to use it, I guess I will rely on "muscle memory" and pray for the best.
 
Back
Top