I know, it seems simple and self-explanatory, yet the left twists it, restricts it, and tries their best to eliminate it.
DOJ files brief to end state-level gun bans
- Thread starter Muley Gil
- Start date
Bozz10mm
US Veteran
Firearm restrictions and requirements do not align with the constitution. "Shall not be infringed" applies to the states just as the rest of the bill of rights applies to the states. States can't pick and choose which 1st amendment rights they want to allow. Or which 5th amendment rights they want to allow, etc.
bushmaster1313
Member
DOJ Amicus Brief here on carry in places open to public without express permission
I started a new thread about this ^^^ case at the Supreme Court
I started a new thread about this ^^^ case at the Supreme Court
Last edited:
bushmaster1313
Member
Anyone able to please post a link to the brief discussed in the OP
saki302
Member
Living in CA, this would be our only hope.
-Dave
-Dave
Did you bother to read the previous replies?
bushmaster1313
Member
I'm 73 yo and am pleased that this tax provision for the so called "no tax" on SS benefits passed and will help so many retired folks. The feds should have never taxed SS benefits. But, as always in these cases of tax reduction changes, they benefit some and the rest of us in higher tax brackets can forget any benefit to begin with! I worked my behind off, had a great income, saved and invested wisely and am blessed to be living comfortably. However, I will continue to be taxed on my SS benefits since I am in a much higher bracket and will continue to pay beaucoup taxes every year...as always.
Did you bother to read the previous replies?
I did read the replies and the OP
The link in the OP talks of a brief filed July 19, 2025. I could find no such brief
