Early 38 Regulation Police

handejector

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
26,038
Reaction score
48,444
Roy tells us in The History of Smith & Wesson that the Regulation Police Models were first produced on March 5, 1917 in both 32 and 38 calibers.
The 32 RP was numbered in the 32 HE serial number series, but the 38 RP was assigned its own series beginning at 1. This is probably because S&W had never made an I frame 38 before.

I have encountered a very early 38 Regulation Police I thought you might want to see.
The gun shown below is Serial Number 92, and was shipped in April, 1917.


handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9552-38-rp-apr-1917.jpg




It is worth noting that the 38 Regulation Police is the first civilian model S&W to have the model name on the gun. It can actually be said that it is the first S&W of any kind to have the model name on it. The US Army contract first model 38 HE's do say "Model 1899", so I suppose we can argue forever whether that is a model name or number. :D


handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9549-model-name-barrel.jpg




handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9551-serial-92.jpg



Not many of the early variants of the 32 and 38 RP's are seen.
Bear in mind production starts on March 5, 1917, and Congress declared war a month later on April 6, 1917. The US Gov't was soon pressuring S&W very hard for ever increasing production of the Model 1917. It is logical to assume that most if not all civilian production was terminated soon after our entry into the War to push hard on 1917 production. By early Sept, 1917's were ready for shipment.
The Gov't kept constant pressure on S&W, finally seizing the plant in Aug, 1918 and not returning control to S&W till Jan, 1919.
S&W seems to have been a bit slow returning to civilian production after this tumultuous period, and we don't find many guns shipped in 1919.
By 1920, production seems to have been fully resumed, but we see some notable changes:
> The polish on the early post-war guns does not equal that seen on pre-war guns.
> Grip medallions were deleted, and the grips are simply checkered American black walnut. The beautiful Circassian grips of pre-war times are gone, never to return. From observation, I believe Circassian was abandoned sometime during or immediately after the 455 contracts. Bear in mind the World War had raged more than 2 years and walnut of any kind had been in high demand by every arms producing nation. German U-boats also made shipping hazardous....
> For roughly a year or more after WW I, S&W's do not have a logo on the gun. Perhaps the roll die was misplaced.
Perhaps that machine had been altered for wartime production and had to be rebuilt.
Perhaps after making 170,000 Model 1917's without logos, they simply forgot to start doing it again! ;)




Of course it has the rebated backstrap we are used to seeing which converts it from a round butt to the square butt:

handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9545-rebated-backstrap.jpg


handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9541-014.jpg


handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9547-gold-medallion.jpg





The grips are numbered in pencil as was normal for the period:

handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9544-018.jpg


handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9543-007.jpg




We are all familiar with the patent date normally seen on the grips, like this later 32 RP has:

handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9554-patent-date-later-rps.jpg



However, this early 38 RP LACKS that stamp, since it was built before the patent was issued:

handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9546-no-patent-date.jpg




An interesting sidenote-
Were you guys aware that early hand ejectors lack forcing cones? There is simply a very slight bevel on the ends of the lands.
The engineering order of August 22, 1922 mandates the forcing cone for HE's.
This gun does have the fouling cup in the topstrap.

handejector-albums-early-38-regulation-police-picture9548-no-forcing-cone.jpg




Summary:
> Early RP's will have a logo on the sideplate.
> Early RP's will have gold medallion grips without the patent date.
> Early RP's will probably have a slightly brighter polish than early postwar guns.
> Early RP's will not have a forcing cone, but do have the fouling cup.
 
Register to hide this ad
What a nice piece of history.
Thank you Lee for sharing such an interesting and educational thread!!
Great pictures..

Regards
 
The early RPs in both calibers are some of my favorite S&Ws. A couple of years ago I connected with .38 RP No. 194, shipped April 15, 1917 to W.S. Brown Co., Pittsburgh PA. Brown must then have jobbed the gun to Oil Well Supply Co. of PA and NY, who scratched their name on the side of the frame. No. 52 is similarly marked and is owned by another forum member.

IMG_0456.jpg


IMG_0451.jpg


IMG_0465.jpg


Despite the limited production timetable imposed by the onset of WWI and the conversion of the factory mostly to government contract production, S&W still managed to pump out about 5,000 .38 RPs in the course of 1917.

No. 194 is in OK shape, but looks as though it got knocked around in a desk drawer for a lot of years. Lee's RP is in way better shape.
 
I have serial number 731, blue, shipped Apr. 27, 1917. It has a two inch barrel. Ed.

Ed, you mentioned that gun in another RP thread a couple of years back. You said it was a factory installed barrel, but I wasn't clear on whether it was an original special order barrel from 1917 or a later replacement. Are there any further details you can offer? I'd love to see a photo.

I envision a Terrier with a rebated frame and RP stocks.
 
David, Reg. .38 Police # 731 was returned to the factory in 1963 to have the original 4 in. barrel replaced with a two inch, according to the factory letter. The new barrel was numbered to the gun and has the service dep't diamond stamp is on the barrel. It has the square butt rebated target style grips, numbered 263 in pencil, with the 1917 date. Current condition is about 99% blue, so I figure S&W refinished it in 1963. I bought it from Jim Supica's Old Town Station many years ago, and it's probably only now that it's worth what he made me pay for it then! I'm thinking about putting rubbers on it and use it for one of my concealed carry pieces. Ed.
 
Worthless blue books aside.. what would one go for in the condition that Handejector showed. I found a 1920 RP in .32 that was pristine but they wanted $599 for it. It still sits there. But these 1917 pre WW1 .38 RP seem "rare". there fore i would expect that they bring a premium. I am just looking for a ball park figure. $500, 1K, 2K, 3K kind of answer.
 
The condition is the nicest RP I've seen. I have one (post WW1) in 38 S&W that is refinished, and is quite worn at that. But I bought it several years ago as a shooter, and its a fun plinker to take out once or twice a year. I just buy ammo for it, not going to ever bother reloading for it. You all would laugh if I posted photos of what I have, compared to yours, it cost me $235 and I had to think it over at that price. Glossy polish, stocks shellac'd, but it does what I want it to.
 
I'm not about to tell Lee what price to put on his RP, but I paid $750 for a boxed early .32 RP in 99% condition about three years ago, when ordinary RPs were $250-300. I thought it was a deal. I suspect you are looking at $750-1000 for a high 90s 1917 RP alone, and $1200 for one in that condition in the original box.

Here's a pic of .32 RP no. 259152, shipped to San Francisco May 26, 1917. This is probably one of the two or three best-preserved guns in my safe.

IMG_0282.jpg
 
David, Did your gun go to Phil Bekeart? Phil was calling his store the "Pacific Coast Branch of Smith & Wesson" at that time! Ed.
 
Ed, it went to to Pacific Hardware & Steel, a local distributor. They merged with Baker & Hamilton in 1918. The firm was known thereafter as Baker-Hamilton-Pacific.

I'm happy it is a San Francisco gun at all, because it reminds me of the days when that town was more gun-reasonable than it is now.
 
I'm not about to tell Lee what price to put on his RP, but I paid $750 for a boxed early .32 RP in 99% condition about three years ago, when ordinary RPs were $250-300. I thought it was a deal. I suspect you are looking at $750-1000 for a high 90s 1917 RP alone, and $1200 for one in that condition in the original box.

Here's a pic of .32 RP no. 259152, shipped to San Francisco May 26, 1917. This is probably one of the two or three best-preserved guns in my safe.

IMG_0282.jpg
Interesting that there is no sideplate logo.
Does it have one on the left?




George, How about yours?
I doubt it, but want to be sure.
This is A later RP but it does have some of the early characteristics. Has the gold S&W logo in the grip,does not have the patent date on the bottom of the grip and no S&W stamped on the side plate. Serial#2381
016ccc.jpg


Are we learning something here?
Did logos disappear on commercial guns in 1917?
 
Last edited:
Despite the limited production timetable imposed by the onset of WWI and the conversion of the factory mostly to government contract production, S&W still managed to pump out about 5,000 .38 RPs in the course of 1917.

David,
Please expand on that a bit.
How do you know?

That seems like a lot for a new model introduced in March when we entered the War in April.
 
Interesting that there is no sideplate logo.
Does it have one on the left?

Are we learning something here?
Did logos disappear on commercial guns in 1917?

No left side logo.

IMG_0277.jpg


A .38 RP produced about the same time (No. 194, the Oil Well gun shown above) has a large logo on the sideplate.

IMG_0447.jpg


The SWCA data base includes a .38 RP with a serial number above 4000 that has no logo anywhere. So some of these 1917 RPs (both .32 and .38) have a logo somewhere, and some don't.


David,
Please expand on that a bit.
How do you know?

That seems like a lot for a new model introduced in March when we entered the War in April.

Well, "know" is too strong a word for what I believe to be true. I'm just interpreting the recorded serial numbers, though I guess I could be overinterpreting them as I did 3-4 years ago before I wised up the reality of S&W serial number chaos. More data would firm up my estimate, but it's still true that of 11 known .38 RPs numbered below 5000, eight of them are confirmed to have shipped in 1917 and the three others are undated. (One of the three is guess-dated to 1917, but I don't count that as a solid ship date.) One in the 42xx range shipped in November of that year. There are no 1918 .38 RPs known to me, but known guns shipped in 1919 are all numbered above 8000. Also I recall but cannot document that a large PD (New York? Philadelphia?) had placed a sizeable order for .38 RPs before they had gone into production. If anyone can confirm or disprove that LE order for me, I'd appreciate it.

[EDITED 10/9/2016 TO ADD: Since I wrote this, two .38 RPs have turned up that date to 1918. No. 5693 shipped in March of that year, and 6592 shipped in April.]

I'm not enough of a historian to know how quickly the US materially involved itself in the war in Europe after declaring war on Germany. After Americans died following resumption of unrestricted submarine warfare in January, and when the contents of the Zimmerman Telegram were confirmed in March, it was probably a foregone conclusion that the US would declare war on Germany; that happened in early April. But S&W did not begin contract production of the U.S. Army Model of 1917 until nearly six months later. Even allowing for an extensive retooling process to convert the factory to military production under government contract (and eventually direct government management, though that didn't happen until late 1918 when the war was almost over), that seems to me to grant time enough to permit significant production of the new RP models as well as continuing production of other commercial models.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top