Early 5" Pre-29 with a story.***UPDATE***

29-1

US Veteran
Joined
Nov 11, 2002
Messages
1,383
Reaction score
2,859
Location
Alexandria, VA
In March, 1956, The American Rifleman ran MG Julian Hatcher's T&E on the new S&W .44 Magnum announced just 2 months earlier. One of the readers of that article was Jim Coppridge, M.D. Jim immediately placed an order for one of the new .44 Magnums with Evaluator's LTD in Quantico, VA which was one of S&W's major east coast distributors at the time and of which Dr.Coppridge was a regular customer. Dr. Coppridge wanted his .44 Magnum in a 5" barrel length, however, and it took the factory a full 18 months to finally deliver one of the first 5" .44 Magnums produced. S172846 is pictured below along with its story in the letters that were exchanged between Jim, Evaluator's and S&W. I was fortunate enough several years ago to obtain this revolver from Dr. Coppridge along with a wealth of its original provenance. I hope that some of you folks will enjoy reading through these letters and as I did, learn a little more about the process of special ordering a revolver from S&W back in the 1950s. It obviously wasn't as easy as one might think. Since acquiring this gun, I have learned that the factory production records lists a 5 inch .44 Magnum having been built and sold on June 30th, 1956, but that revolver has never turned up nor do we know its serial number. Yet another grail gun to be found
icon_smile.gif

Happy Easter
Chuck

<span class="ev_code_RED">***</span>Since the above post, I have been informed by Roy Jinks at S&W that after a more detailed search of the factory records concerning S172846, it has been determined that this revolver is in fact, the first 5" .44 Magnum manufactured and that the mystery 5" gun in the manufacturing records recorded as being produced and sold on 30 June, 1956 is the one and the same gun as in this post. I will be receiving a new letter stating such. This news made my day!! <span class="ev_code_RED">***</span>

The earliest 5" revolvers were contained in the standard 6 1/2 inch dark blue cases.
orig.jpg


This photo shows the faint outline of the cutout for the end of a regular 6 1/2" barrel.
orig.jpg


orig.jpg


orig.jpg


Dr. Coppridge put Sanderson Target stocks on all of his handguns and his new .44 Magnum got the same treatment. The finger grooves are not common on Sanderson stocks.
orig.jpg

orig.jpg

orig.jpg


Like many shooters of that day, Coppridge was a disciple of Keith and his hotter .44 Special load. Here's an early letter from Keith to Coppridge giving a preview of things to come in .44 Caliber
icon_smile.gif

orig.jpg


Coppridge's letter to Evaluator's ordering his .44 Magnum. His was not the first 5" built, but it was most probably the first one ordered.
orig.jpg


Excerpt of the March, 1956 American Rifleman article that led to Dr. Coppridge's placing his order with Evaluator's for one of the new .44 Magnums.
orig.jpg

orig.jpg


orig.jpg


Literature/order blank and business card sent to Dr. Coppridge to place his order.
orig.jpg

orig.jpg


Letter from Evaluator's giving Coppridge an update, but it also gives insight on the beginning shipments of the 4 inch pre-29.

orig.jpg


A not so plesant letter however from Fred Miller at S&W. He must have been quite a character.
icon_razz.gif


orig.jpg

orig.jpg


Coppridge is persistent
icon_smile.gif

orig.jpg


Finally!
icon_eek.gif

orig.jpg


Invoice from Evaluator's
orig.jpg


Factory Letter
orig.jpg


orig.jpg


orig.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
Chuck:
Thanks for the excellent report and photography. Apparently his source of ammo didn't do business with Remington. I wonder if the owner of the earlier 5 incher, to which you referred, received a scalding note from Mr. Miller regarding the custom length.
Ed
 
Ed, good question. I have several letters written by Fred Miller concerning other guns and he's pretty much consistent with his lecturing tone. He most always ends his letters however, on a positive note, for what it must have been worth to the reader by that point. The 1st 5 inch pre-29, would have been a 5 screw variation by the way, which Dr. Coppridge's would also have been had it been built during the year (1956) it was first ordered.
 
Beautiful revolver, fasinating story! Thanks for taking the time to post this!!!
 
Chuck,
Great photos and documentation...truly the kind of history lesson we all appreciate!
Don
 
I loved this! Had a few letters from Fred Miller in my youth, and found him very helpful.
The gun and the correspondence is a really nice package.

T-Star
 
Another outstanding post, and set of pictures Chuck!

The letter from Elmer Keith is quite interesting. It displays what I've read many times about his spelling and punctuation.

Over all, a great piece of history for us all to enjoy, courtesy of a great collector, and nice man. Thank you.
 
Another outstanding post, and set of pictures Chuck!

The letter from Elmer Keith is quite interesting. It displays what I've read many times about his spelling and punctuation.

Over all, a great piece of history for us all to enjoy, courtesy of a great collector, and nice man. Thank you.


Tim, happy to spread the word about the .44 Magnum any way I can. As many of you are by now painfully aware, I enjoy trying to put the puzzle together with the guns in my collection and it "makes my day" when I can make a connection between the gun and its origins. I just wish I had more time to devote to doing so.
Chuck
 
Another really cool post, I love how you regularly seem to come up with all the cool documentation. I think I am lucky just to get the right grips on one, much less a box!!!
 
Thank you very much for putting together this post. I really enjoyed reading through all of the letters regarding the special order process of this fine gun.
Your pictures are equally impressive.
 
Chuck,

Beautiful gun and thanks much for sharing the great history lesson. I always look forward to your posts - and am rewarded yet again.

Jerry
 
This place is a wealth of knowledge on the old smiths. This post is no different.

Just a question though, the letter indicates a 5 screw gun, the pics seem to show a 3 screw gun. Which is it?

A fine revolver in any event, wish they still built them that way. 308
 
What an outstanding post.I am as intrigued by the correspondance and detail to customer service as I am to your outstanding model 29.Imagine if things were like that today.Thank You for sharing.
 
This place is a wealth of knowledge on the old smiths. This post is no different.

Just a question though, the letter indicates a 5 screw gun, the pics seem to show a 3 screw gun. Which is it?

A fine revolver in any event, wish they still built them that way. 308

308-good catch! The gun is actually a 4 screw, not a 5 screw. Sometimes a factory letter is incorrect,
but generally they are right on. I could send this back to Roy for correction, but it's not worth the time it would take, which he really doesn't have much of anyway.

Chuck
 
I have always assumed that special order guns were either for VIPS who got expedited treatment on their orders or for folks with a lot of patience.

Still, wouldn't it be fun to hop into the time machine and go back to 1956 and order that pair of 44s with 3.5" and 7.5" barrels? Especially at $118 each.
 
What is it with five inch S&W revolvers? I have two K frames in that length and my friends keep asking me how my health is.
icon_smile.gif

DW
 

Latest posts

Back
Top