Early, post-war .38 M&P

daveboy

Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Messages
168
Reaction score
419
A few days ago I added to my meager collection of older Smith and Wesson .38 Special revolvers. This six-inch, M&P fills a nice void. I won it in an online auction (4 and a half beans including shipping and tax) and was pleasantly surprised to see how nice the condition is. I've taken it down to inspect/lube and the insides look as unused as the outside. The facts that it doesn't have a cylinder ring, the color-case hardening on the hammer and trigger look fresh, the bore looks like a rifled mirror, and it is almost blemish-free would make be believe that it has never been used. However, there is a tiny amount of holster wear on the muzzle, and a couple of tiny scratches on it. The finish is so pristine that I at first thought it might have been reblued. But, the stampings are sharp, even, and deep, including the very fine trademark info on the top of the barrel. So, I'm just thinking it simply stayed in a holster inside a drawer for many years. The only downside (for a diehard collector, which I'm not) is that it came with target stocks that would have been made at least twenty-years later. I had this nice set of diamond, magnas sitting around. So, even though they are not "exactly" correct, they are close enough for now. I'm looking forward to sending a few rounds downrange to see how she shoots.
DSC_2110.jpgDSC_2094.jpgDSC_2096.jpgDSC_2105.jpgDSC_2100.jpg
 
Register to hide this ad
That is a very nice example, daveboy.

Would you be willing to share the serial number for my research? It should be no higher than about S877000, since it still has the barrel shaped knob. There are a few higher than that, but not many. I do show one 6" with a serial number in the S880000 range.
 
Certainly. If you have any born-on date I'd appreciate it.
 

Attachments

  • DSC_2103.jpg
    DSC_2103.jpg
    371.4 KB · Views: 22
Thanks. Probably August 1947.

But this is really odd. That late, it should NOT have that knob. I suggest you check to see what serial number is stamped on the underside of the extractor star and on the barrel flat. Do those match the butt number and the one on the rear face of the cylinder? The barrel is clearly machined for the larger knob, so that suggests they go together. Perhaps old parts got used up in 1947. But I've not seen this before and there are some 15,000 units in my database.
 
Thanks. Probably August 1947.

But this is really odd. That late, it should NOT have that knob. I suggest you check to see what serial number is stamped on the underside of the extractor star and on the barrel flat. Do those match the butt number and the one on the rear face of the cylinder? The barrel is clearly machined for the larger knob, so that suggests they go together. Perhaps old parts got used up in 1947. But I've not seen this before and there are some 15,000 units in my database.
The numbers all match.
 
Back
Top