I've watched a number of guns sell at auction this year, mostly the RIA auctions as I could handle everything on their preview days. At least a dozen Registered Magnums were sold this year and many other collectible guns and most of them had little or no provenance. The RMs, if they had anything, sometimes had a S&W historical letter.
I sat through much of last weekend's RIA auction doing a little bidding but no buying. There were some very interesting pieces such as the 1942 Winchester M70 carbine in 257 Roberts that sold for $99,875 plus tax/shipping.
At the end an RM came up that I had looked at but hadn't considered buying. It had a box not numbered so maybe not THE box but in good condition, cleaning brush, but no documentation. The gun was advertised as 98% original condition and appeared to be so although the magnas didn't number to the gun. I was surprised that such a nice piece would not have any provenance with it but when there wasn't much bidding action I bought it.
Got it home and did a little internet research and up pops info from previous sales and it does have provenance. Excerpt from the S&W letter and a good bit of history on the original buyer, a LT in the Coast Guard who participated in the WWII invasion of France and later the invasion of Okinawa and retired as a Rear Admiral. How previous owners let that provenance get away is surprising to me. Would also like to have seen that holster and belt that the LT bought from S&W for $1.25. The condition of the gun suggests LT Maley may never have gotten around to firing the 500 rounds of ammo he bought with it.
Needless to say I'm pleased with the gun and the bonus of the provenance. Which brings up a question, what do you do to insure that the provenance for your collectibles doesn't get separated from the guns?
Jeff
SWCA #1457
https://flic.kr/p/2qz6e4f https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qyZgpH https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qz4USp https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qz6czd https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qz4TkM https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qz4TgJ https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
https://flic.kr/p/2qz65PJ https://www.flickr.com/photos/194934231@N03/
I sat through much of last weekend's RIA auction doing a little bidding but no buying. There were some very interesting pieces such as the 1942 Winchester M70 carbine in 257 Roberts that sold for $99,875 plus tax/shipping.
At the end an RM came up that I had looked at but hadn't considered buying. It had a box not numbered so maybe not THE box but in good condition, cleaning brush, but no documentation. The gun was advertised as 98% original condition and appeared to be so although the magnas didn't number to the gun. I was surprised that such a nice piece would not have any provenance with it but when there wasn't much bidding action I bought it.
Got it home and did a little internet research and up pops info from previous sales and it does have provenance. Excerpt from the S&W letter and a good bit of history on the original buyer, a LT in the Coast Guard who participated in the WWII invasion of France and later the invasion of Okinawa and retired as a Rear Admiral. How previous owners let that provenance get away is surprising to me. Would also like to have seen that holster and belt that the LT bought from S&W for $1.25. The condition of the gun suggests LT Maley may never have gotten around to firing the 500 rounds of ammo he bought with it.
Needless to say I'm pleased with the gun and the bonus of the provenance. Which brings up a question, what do you do to insure that the provenance for your collectibles doesn't get separated from the guns?
Jeff
SWCA #1457







Last edited: