Finally got a 1903 Colt Pocket Hammerless

sigp220.45

US Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2005
Messages
8,615
Reaction score
36,367
Location
Colorado
I've been looking for one for a while. They aren't rare, but the ones I came across were either buffed and pitted and reblued, or really nice and carrying a price tag to match. This one has plenty of honest wear, but the markings are sharp and I think the finish is worn but original. I suspect the grips are from a later model, and I'm sure the mag is a repro, but the price was right so here it is:





Chambering is, of course, the mighty "Calibre .32 Rimless Smokeless".



The serial number dates it to 1913, the beginning of Woodrow Wilson's presidency.

The early ones had a separate bushing, ala the 1911.



The prancing pony is still sharp.



With its Belgian cousin. The family resemblance is pretty obvious.



I haven't shot it yet, and I hope my 56 year old eyes are compatible with the 102 year old sights.

It really feels good in the hand, and while its "big for a .32" that doesn't bother me. It makes me feel like Bogie at the end of Casablanca, and that counts for something.

Anyone else a fan?
 
Last edited:
Register to hide this ad
You found your self a nice one! Looks well taken care of for the age.
As you may know I recently received a slightly newer version of the same pistol (1944) and I agree that it fits the hand well and is a handsome pistol. I'm looking forward to shooting mine soon. Bob
 
If the new Colt wasn't $1500, I'd buy a new model to shoot. The darned things are so accurate it is incredible.

Don't be fooled, the european loading of the .32 ACP is good enough to use as a carry piece. It will kill far more quickly than you would care to imagine.The Buffalo Bore 73-grain +p load for the cartridge will penetrate a skull or breastbone with consummate ease and kill a human rather quickly.

Bullet placement and penetration from the old 1903 Model with new 73-grain +p Buffalo Bore will "settle somone's hash"... right now!
 
Last edited:
Mag may be original -- need pics

Very nice old Colt!

The magazines for the earliest pocket autos differed in several respects
from the later "2-tone" and late full-blue models that everyone is familiar with. If you could please post some detailed photos of your mag, I can probably tell you if it is an early original. Especially need to see pics of both sides, the bottom of both sides in detail, and the magazine feed lips and follower.

These are fantastic pistols. I wouldn't trust the new Colt repros to be anywhere near as totally reliable and accurate as even a worn original.
I used a .380 as my CCW for 18 years, and have shot thousands of handloads with LRN through several of them. I literally have never had one malfunction. Ever.

Good luck with your gat -- I am properly envious! :)

John
 
I love mine.... You will find it to be quite accurate and a joy to shoot. One of JMB's finest renditions IMHO. Don't let people tell you the .32 acp is worthless. Nobody I know would want to stand in front of one.
DSCF2104a_zpsh0gdehvi.jpg
 
Last edited:
Last week was the first time I handled one. Nice gun...for its time. This example was in about the same condition as yours. After holding it I thought 2 things. 1) how big people's pockets must have been back then. Today a pocket gun is half the size and still just barely fits. 2) people had tiny infant hands. I couldn't reliability grip the gun and disengage the grip safety. The grip was sooooo thin. I thought about picking it up but I'm beginning to think my days of surplus and just old guns in general collecting is coming to an end. I had this feeling that it would sit around for a while while I regretted the monetary spending and traded it towards something else.
 
It really feels good in the hand, and while its "big for a .32" that doesn't bother me. It makes me feel like Bogie at the end of Casablanca, and that counts for something.

Anyone else a fan?

Actually, more like Bogie in "Key Largo" ;) .

Mine shipped on April 30, 1917, shortly after our entry into the war, to a hardware store in Milwaukie. There is no bluing left, but no trace of abrasion or corrosion either. It must have just rubbed off over decades of carry. I'd love to know this gun's story.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    40.7 KB · Views: 109
  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    94.8 KB · Views: 109
I'm a fan. :D
I've got a 1903 .32 with a well worn finish and a 1908 .380 that's been refinished. Got both of them at decent prices and they're both great shooters.
The Pocket Hammerless Model M is one of those classic guns that you just can't help but like. ;)
 
Colt is building them again (2500 of them) the price is steep, but they are "Parkerized" and are rollmarked as "US Army Issue".

If you can afford the $1500.00 price tag, you'd best get one while you can.
 
Last edited:
Congrats on the 1903!!

This website by far has the best info around about the 1903 Model M's: Colt Automatic Pistol and Revolver Information - 18 years of Service to Colt Firearms Collectors

PDF's of the original instruction sheets are also available for download.

Don't waste your time with the aftermarket magazines, the general consensus on the Colt forum from people with experience with them is most of the time they don't work well, and why used Colt magazines for these guns are running in the $100.00 neighborhood.

This is my 1903 .32acp - 1918 type III, with it's big brother Series '70 Gold cup:

I put those later style Colt emblem aftermarket wood grips on it to preserve the original black hard rubber grips, which are in excellent shape, as is the gun itself:

 
Last edited:
Per Gunhacker:

"Don't waste your time with the aftermarket magazines, the general consensus on the Colt forum from people with experience with them is most of the time they don't work well, and why used Colt magazines for these guns are running in the $100.00 neighborhood."

What he said! It's almost unheard-of for aftermarket mags to work.
John
 
Back
Top