There were two for sale in this auction: (1) Lot #1594, serial number 458. It was described, as follows: "CONDITION: Extremely fine with most all finish remaining with very little loss at high points of cyl, backstrap and trigger guard. Bbl markings are very light and believed to be over polished at manufacture or possibly a very early factory re-finish. Bore is exceptional, mechanics are fine. Matching SN’s are found on frame, cyl and bbl. Grips fit excellently, but not numbered to gun." Estimated to go for $1,750 to $2500, and it brought $575. (2) Lot #1595, serial number 1722, described, as follows: "CONDITION: Exceptionally fine, with most all blue finish remaining. Finish loss on backstrap, trigger guard, high points of cyl and muzzle are very minimal. Spectacular bore an mechanics. Virtually all case color remains on trigger guard and hammer. Matching numbers found on bbl, cyl, frame and grips. An exceptionally scarce gun in blue finish, in amazingly fine condition." Expected to bring $1250 to $1750, and it brought $1667.50.
What am I missing? I simply cannot tell from the photographs if the first one was refinished, or not, but it certainly would not have been refinished at the factory, because it would have had the star and the date in month and year format indicating a return to the factory. Did those handling this firearm determine that there was indeed a non-factory refinish, and, hence, the low price? Or was there something drastically more severely wrong with this firearm, like a cracked forcing cone, not described, from someone firing a .22 LR round in this firearm. From the photographs, provided the first one was not a refinish, it clearly appears better than the second one, but brought well below the pre-auction estimate.
What am I missing? I simply cannot tell from the photographs if the first one was refinished, or not, but it certainly would not have been refinished at the factory, because it would have had the star and the date in month and year format indicating a return to the factory. Did those handling this firearm determine that there was indeed a non-factory refinish, and, hence, the low price? Or was there something drastically more severely wrong with this firearm, like a cracked forcing cone, not described, from someone firing a .22 LR round in this firearm. From the photographs, provided the first one was not a refinish, it clearly appears better than the second one, but brought well below the pre-auction estimate.