First Shots: S&W Model 60-8 w/3" Bbl...

Stephen A. Camp

Absent Comrade
Joined
Jun 7, 2003
Messages
112
Reaction score
19
Location
Denton, Texas, USA
Hello. I recently picked up a very lightly used S&W Model 60-8 with 3" bbl and adjustable sights. A routine once-over didn't result in any surprises or reveal anything negative...other than the rubber grips, which happened to be a style I just don't care for.

Getting it home, I cleaned it up, made another check, more slowly this time, and changed the inexpensive rubber grips with a cheap wooden pair that felt better to me. I am not sure if they'll stay on the gun or not. (They definitely will not if I opt to use this one as a defensive arm. The reason is two-fold: They will not work with speedloaders for one and when ejecting fired cases, the one at the bottom (six-o'clock) position is impeded from being ejected by the relatively thick grip panel. Modification of these stocks or using a different style would be necessary in my opinion.)

SWModel603inbbl006.jpg

My only other 3" Model 60 was one having the J-frame style square butt, a heavy bbl with no shroud. It sort of resembled a shrunken Model 64. I believe that this is my first one with adjustable sights.(The ammunition shown is a handload using 4.6 grains of Unique beneath a Hornady 158-gr. LSWCHP. This hits about 860 ft/sec from other 3" guns I own, though I have not yet chronographed it through this one.)

SWModel603inbbl009.jpg

I was surprised to see the "NY-1" marking on this little shooter as it has a spur hammer and is capable of both double and single-action fire. The only revolvers I've seen with such markings were K-frames having bobbed hammer spurs and DAO.

Despite having been a police department tactical team leader and firearm instructor for 11 years, I do not feel the need for "tactical" handguns and by modern standards, I reckon this would not be one. Nor do I feel the need to make all of my range visits "practical", defensive style shooting. For me, fun still rates high on my list, right up there with my multitudenous regrets for letting all of the S&W Kit-Guns I've owned in past decades get away. For now, I envision this little 60-8 with perhaps a hard cast SWC loaded to standard velocities as a sort of substitute. I might just wind up shooting it at paper simply because I like to. That's good enough for me. Years ago, I was told by a shooting legend (in his own mind) that I obviously didn't understand "the purpose of the handgun", for if I did, I wouldn't even own a revolver, just a certain style and caliber autoloader. I didn't mention to the blowhard that I already owned 11 of the pistols he was pushing. I didn't bother to mention that the purpose of my handguns is whatever I want it to be. I suggest that the same is true for any handgun owner or shooter. The purpose of their handguns is whatever they desire.

I've been extremely busy lately with little time to shoot but today I managed a few minutes at the range with the little S&W. It was off-and-on windy and looked like rain was a distinct possibility, so I only shot at 12 yards, using a two-hand hold from a standing position. I used two loads, both from Georgia Arms. One was their light 125-gr. LFP at a listed velocity of 750 ft/sec and the other a plated flat point, although they describe it as a SWC. It's velocity is listed at 800 ft/sec. I didn't have time to chronograph either load and it was so overcast that I'm not sure I could have.

I began by firing 5 rounds of the 125-gr. load and discovered that the POI was slightly below the POA at 12-yards. Making a vertical sight adjustment, I got it to put the holes where I wanted them, at least at this distance.

SWModel603inbbl012.jpg

In this 20-shot group, I think that the true POI is just below the center of the dark 2" bullseye and that the hits just above midline are errors on my part.

SWModel603inbbl013.jpg

Likewise, in this 20-shot group using the heavier 158-gr load, I think that hits at or below the midline are my fault. It's fairly obvious that the little gun was intially sighted in for the 158-gr. bullet.

I find it a good thing that at this distance at least, either load hits close enough to POA for decent "fun shooting" or even some target-shooting w/o having to change the sights.

The action on the little thing was slicker than I expected and I feared that perhaps a too-light mainspring had been substituted.

SWModel603inbbl015.jpg

Today's session consisted only of about 80 shots of Georgia Arms' "canned heat" .38 Special ammunition but there were no misfires and primer strikes appear adequate. That is not sufficient shooting for me to trust the gun for anything "serious" but that's no great "loss" as I have plenty of "serious" ones already.

On a ranch where I frequently help a friend do chores, there were untold numbers of water moccasins in years past. I am not sure why as there was but a couple of ponds and they were not near one another. There is a creek on it, but it is only on one border. Anyway, the stinkin' things were all over. I wacked many to death with tree limbs but shot a few, too.

Though I've not seen any rabid critters there, I have seen a rabid fox or two over the years and perhaps four rabid skunks. All attacked when they heard or smelled me (I'm not sure which...if either) and in each case a firearm (.22 rifle in one case, and 9mm Hi Power in the others) stopped them and humanely dispatched them.

Perhaps this little 3" .38 Special will make a most compact, yet easy-to-shoot sidearm for such considerations?

...or maybe the truth is that I just like the darned thing.

Best.
 
Register to hide this ad
Hello. I recently picked up a very lightly used S&W Model 60-8 with 3" bbl and adjustable sights. A routine once-over didn't result in any surprises or reveal anything negative...other than the rubber grips, which happened to be a style I just don't care for.

Getting it home, I cleaned it up, made another check, more slowly this time, and changed the inexpensive rubber grips with a cheap wooden pair that felt better to me. I am not sure if they'll stay on the gun or not. (They definitely will not if I opt to use this one as a defensive arm. The reason is two-fold: They will not work with speedloaders for one and when ejecting fired cases, the one at the bottom (six-o'clock) position is impeded from being ejected by the relatively thick grip panel. Modification of these stocks or using a different style would be necessary in my opinion.)

SWModel603inbbl006.jpg

My only other 3" Model 60 was one having the J-frame style square butt, a heavy bbl with no shroud. It sort of resembled a shrunken Model 64. I believe that this is my first one with adjustable sights.(The ammunition shown is a handload using 4.6 grains of Unique beneath a Hornady 158-gr. LSWCHP. This hits about 860 ft/sec from other 3" guns I own, though I have not yet chronographed it through this one.)

SWModel603inbbl009.jpg

I was surprised to see the "NY-1" marking on this little shooter as it has a spur hammer and is capable of both double and single-action fire. The only revolvers I've seen with such markings were K-frames having bobbed hammer spurs and DAO.

Despite having been a police department tactical team leader and firearm instructor for 11 years, I do not feel the need for "tactical" handguns and by modern standards, I reckon this would not be one. Nor do I feel the need to make all of my range visits "practical", defensive style shooting. For me, fun still rates high on my list, right up there with my multitudenous regrets for letting all of the S&W Kit-Guns I've owned in past decades get away. For now, I envision this little 60-8 with perhaps a hard cast SWC loaded to standard velocities as a sort of substitute. I might just wind up shooting it at paper simply because I like to. That's good enough for me. Years ago, I was told by a shooting legend (in his own mind) that I obviously didn't understand "the purpose of the handgun", for if I did, I wouldn't even own a revolver, just a certain style and caliber autoloader. I didn't mention to the blowhard that I already owned 11 of the pistols he was pushing. I didn't bother to mention that the purpose of my handguns is whatever I want it to be. I suggest that the same is true for any handgun owner or shooter. The purpose of their handguns is whatever they desire.

I've been extremely busy lately with little time to shoot but today I managed a few minutes at the range with the little S&W. It was off-and-on windy and looked like rain was a distinct possibility, so I only shot at 12 yards, using a two-hand hold from a standing position. I used two loads, both from Georgia Arms. One was their light 125-gr. LFP at a listed velocity of 750 ft/sec and the other a plated flat point, although they describe it as a SWC. It's velocity is listed at 800 ft/sec. I didn't have time to chronograph either load and it was so overcast that I'm not sure I could have.

I began by firing 5 rounds of the 125-gr. load and discovered that the POI was slightly below the POA at 12-yards. Making a vertical sight adjustment, I got it to put the holes where I wanted them, at least at this distance.

SWModel603inbbl012.jpg

In this 20-shot group, I think that the true POI is just below the center of the dark 2" bullseye and that the hits just above midline are errors on my part.

SWModel603inbbl013.jpg

Likewise, in this 20-shot group using the heavier 158-gr load, I think that hits at or below the midline are my fault. It's fairly obvious that the little gun was intially sighted in for the 158-gr. bullet.

I find it a good thing that at this distance at least, either load hits close enough to POA for decent "fun shooting" or even some target-shooting w/o having to change the sights.

The action on the little thing was slicker than I expected and I feared that perhaps a too-light mainspring had been substituted.

SWModel603inbbl015.jpg

Today's session consisted only of about 80 shots of Georgia Arms' "canned heat" .38 Special ammunition but there were no misfires and primer strikes appear adequate. That is not sufficient shooting for me to trust the gun for anything "serious" but that's no great "loss" as I have plenty of "serious" ones already.

On a ranch where I frequently help a friend do chores, there were untold numbers of water moccasins in years past. I am not sure why as there was but a couple of ponds and they were not near one another. There is a creek on it, but it is only on one border. Anyway, the stinkin' things were all over. I wacked many to death with tree limbs but shot a few, too.

Though I've not seen any rabid critters there, I have seen a rabid fox or two over the years and perhaps four rabid skunks. All attacked when they heard or smelled me (I'm not sure which...if either) and in each case a firearm (.22 rifle in one case, and 9mm Hi Power in the others) stopped them and humanely dispatched them.

Perhaps this little 3" .38 Special will make a most compact, yet easy-to-shoot sidearm for such considerations?

...or maybe the truth is that I just like the darned thing.

Best.
 
Beautiful gun.

Man, I can't shoot that good from a distance of two inches for pete's sake!!
icon_biggrin.gif
 
Nice report....nice gun....and the targets, regardless of the gun type, most certainly ARE 'tactical'.....
 
Mr. Camp, you continue to amaze me. An excellent write up, great pictures, and some darn fine shooting, IMO.

I've been looking at that exact same model, this write up may have sealed the deal for me.

Thanks!
 
Stephen,

Thanks for another informative and well-illustrated post. That's a neat little gun that I had not previously given much attention to. Nice shooting, by the way!

Jerry
 
Stephen,

Interesting write up on your newly acquired Model 60-8. I always enjoy reading your posts on the forum. I believe these 3" adjustable J Frame revolvers are sweet and just plain fun. I love my Model 60-4 3".
 
Thank you Mr. Camp for another of your well-written and informative posts. I have three of your books (Hi-Power, Self-Defense and 1911) and refer to them often, and have enjoyed them as well as learning alot from them.
 
steve,

as a retired officer and a long time shooter, i agree totally with you on "tactical" handguns, that so many of these macho types with something to prove to others, and most importantly to themselves, need.

ed
 
Steve;
I have the earlier .38 Special Chief Target (3" full underlugged barrel but chambered for the .38 Special). I have used it as my trail gun for many bird and rabbit hunts where my primary gun was a Beretta Over/Under. I carried the Model 60 in a small OWB cross draw holster (to keep from marring the shotgun stock). It makes a DANDY revolver to use on sitting rabbits (always made me popular with the family as they LOVE rabbit, especially with only one hole in them). They always appreciated not having to pick shot out of their teeth. They are also useful for dispatching those broken wing grouse that seem to run about as fast as a race horse (but will often allow you to get within easy revolver range). It is no great trick to shoot their heads off. Again, the family is quite impressed with head shot grouse
icon_biggrin.gif
.

These are NOT "super hero shots" but easily done by someone competent with a revolver.

I have often shot in the high nineties with a Model 60 Chiefs Target revolver on the timed fire target.

Just a fine, practical piece for a certified woods walker.

My favorite load for mine is a 150 gr dbl ended wadcutter ahead of 3.5 grs of Bullseye (or equivalent). I prefer the first band seated outside the case and lightly taper crimped. I seat the sprue up so my bullet base is perfect. The rounds don't look quite as nice but they shoot better (Function before Form).

That is not a bad defense load, either.

Congratulations! You have a winner there!

Dale53
 
I was surprised to see the "NY-1" marking on this little shooter as it has a spur hammer and is capable of both double and single-action fire. The only revolvers I've seen with such markings were K-frames having bobbed hammer spurs and DAO.[/i]

The NYPD had a few M60's with the bobbed hammer.
Here's one:

100_1356.jpg


Didn't realize they made a 3 inch with adj sights.
icon_confused.gif
 
Note to self: Buy groceries and lock up
checkbook and credit card
before reading posts by
Camp.....
icon_frown.gif
 
Stephen: The 38 Kit gun as the Model 60 series exemplifies is the finest walkaround gun I've ever had the priviledge to own (60-4).

Thank you for illustrating such an underappreciated companion.
 
Hey Fellas,
the 3" M-60 stamped NY-1 is one of the M-60 NY-1's that were returned to S&W after NYPD disallowed their officers to carry them. S&W swapped in the 3"barrels and standard hammers then sold them off through regular dealers. i don't think it letters to NYPD but i sure lust after it and will "for the record" offer to purchase it from Mr.Camp should it go up for sale (anytime) i will see if i can put up the article R.M.Vivas posted a while ago on the M-60 NY-1 that and the SCSW contains all i know.
Regards,
Rich
 
Back
Top