Radar indicated 62 MPH in a 30 MPH residential area. Driver, a teacher and assistant principal, explained that she was almost out of gas so she needed to get to the gas station as fast as she could before running out.
Radar indicated 56 MPH in a 20 MPH school zone, violator passing several stopped school buses loading children at the end of the day. Driver explained that she didn't want to be late picking up her children at the school.
Radar indicated 47 MPH in a 30 MPH residential area. Driver, wife of a local defense attorney, said her husband would kill her if she got another speeding ticket, started unbuttoning her blouse and asked if we could work something out. The tape recording was later entered in evidence twice, once at traffic court and later at a deposition for the divorce action.
Prime suspect in a forgery/fraud case gave a long and drawn out version of events. I listened patiently, then pointed out all the inconsistencies between his story and the statements of several others, told him I didn't believe him so he needed to come up with another story to tell. He proceeded to give another completely different version of events, with a straight face. Bingo! Probable cause plus two different stories equals conviction in court, no need to prove which version was true or which was a lie, the only possible conclusion is that he was a liar. No reasonable doubt at that point.
Too many more to remember right now.