JBarbaresi
Member
Hi, first post in this forum for me. They say admitting a problem is the first step to recovery, so here goes... I am a long time loyal Glock "fanboy" in the process of being converted to the M&P platform. One of the reasons it has taken me so long to warm up to the M&P is the trigger; I'm not a huge fan of the excessively long pre-travel caused by the joint and I don't care for the long and indistiguishable reset either. After doing some reading and learning about the many parts offered through Apex to correct those two issues I had, I decided it was worth my while to pick up a 9FS and put it through the paces. After several hundred rounds through the stock configuration I can say that I am definitely well on my way to replacing my G19 as a go-to gun, but the trigger still needs some work before I can comfortably do that.
Now that I have some trigger time on the weapon, I realize the jointed trigger is not all that bad and I think it is something I would be able to deal with. I already know I will be installing a RAM to help with the tactile reset issue. Now I am tossed up between going with the FSS or the DCAEK to complete the trigger work, and I would appreciate some opinions from those of you who have tried one or both and have a recommendation for me.
My gun is model 209301, the 9FS without a thumb safety and no mag disconnect. This gun will be used primarily for self defense and possible concealed carry if I can find a suitable holster, maybe even competition use down the road as I continue to improve with it. At first glance the FSS seems like the way to go due to the shortened pre-travel and forward set striker release point, but I am still slightly hesitant to go that route over the DCAEK. I am not concerned about the safety factor of the shorter pull without having a thumb safety (been shooting Glocks with several trigger mods long enough to practice good habits) and I definitely do not want to start a "liability" war about messing with a trigger on a SD/Carry weapon, been there and done that.
So what it ultimately boils down to is function and reliability, the FSS kit makes some serious changes in timing to the entire action, borderline disengages the striker block safety, and I've read several threads about having failures to fire due to the redesigned sear (although they mostly seem to be alleviated with use of the most recent sear block design with the 1/8" sear spring). From my understanding the DCAEK just cleans up the break, smooths out the pretravel, and eliminates the over-travel, but it still retains a long pull before getting to the staging point. I also think the DCAEK more closely mimicks the stock action in terms of the internal components working together, which I prefer on a SD gun.
So here's my question: how similar is the actual "break" feel/weight between the FSS and DCAEK? Is there any reason to not 100% trust the reliability of the FSS kit? My gun is a recent production so has the most updated sear block design. Any other reason to consider the DCAEK over the FSS that I'm missing (other than price)?
Thanks in advance.
Now that I have some trigger time on the weapon, I realize the jointed trigger is not all that bad and I think it is something I would be able to deal with. I already know I will be installing a RAM to help with the tactile reset issue. Now I am tossed up between going with the FSS or the DCAEK to complete the trigger work, and I would appreciate some opinions from those of you who have tried one or both and have a recommendation for me.
My gun is model 209301, the 9FS without a thumb safety and no mag disconnect. This gun will be used primarily for self defense and possible concealed carry if I can find a suitable holster, maybe even competition use down the road as I continue to improve with it. At first glance the FSS seems like the way to go due to the shortened pre-travel and forward set striker release point, but I am still slightly hesitant to go that route over the DCAEK. I am not concerned about the safety factor of the shorter pull without having a thumb safety (been shooting Glocks with several trigger mods long enough to practice good habits) and I definitely do not want to start a "liability" war about messing with a trigger on a SD/Carry weapon, been there and done that.
So what it ultimately boils down to is function and reliability, the FSS kit makes some serious changes in timing to the entire action, borderline disengages the striker block safety, and I've read several threads about having failures to fire due to the redesigned sear (although they mostly seem to be alleviated with use of the most recent sear block design with the 1/8" sear spring). From my understanding the DCAEK just cleans up the break, smooths out the pretravel, and eliminates the over-travel, but it still retains a long pull before getting to the staging point. I also think the DCAEK more closely mimicks the stock action in terms of the internal components working together, which I prefer on a SD gun.
So here's my question: how similar is the actual "break" feel/weight between the FSS and DCAEK? Is there any reason to not 100% trust the reliability of the FSS kit? My gun is a recent production so has the most updated sear block design. Any other reason to consider the DCAEK over the FSS that I'm missing (other than price)?
Thanks in advance.
Last edited: