Full Auto 5906TSW
- Thread starter 4864
- Start date
Register to hide this ad
presspics
Member
That's pretty badass!! Where do I sign up?
G
Guest
That is pretty cool, I just have to wonder if the range owner liked him shooting up the ceiling towards the end of the mag???
G
Guest
I gave up shooting Machine Guns of any kind when "Uncle" stopped paying my ammo and gun repair bills!!! Both are High Dollar$$$ and pretty much a waste.
a) I'm assuming there is something wrong with the sear and it malfunctions to auto fire (or was it smith'ed to actually fire full auto?) and
b) Can he (the owner) get in trouble with the federales for having a full auto weapon assuming he didn't pay the tax and other papers related to full auto? Remember that story of the Guard/Reserve member who was prosecuted for having a malfunctioning rifle that went off full auto?
b) Can he (the owner) get in trouble with the federales for having a full auto weapon assuming he didn't pay the tax and other papers related to full auto? Remember that story of the Guard/Reserve member who was prosecuted for having a malfunctioning rifle that went off full auto?
varoadking
Member
That was no malfunction - it was a purpose built gun. Notice the fore grip...
TAC
Member
The fore grip is just a standard Picatiny rail mounted vertical grip, mounted to the equipment rail that comes standard on the TSW line of handguns. Last time I checked this was also illegal!
gmchenry
Member
Here's another video of the same pistol;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS9QvCwNsaM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QS9QvCwNsaM
ACP230
Member
Machine pistols can still be made as "Post Samples" (post the 1986 law banning new MGs fro private individuals) by licensed manufacturors. Unfortunately, they can only be sold to police, the military, and gov't agencies.
I've fired a full auto Glock 34. It was ported and relatively controllable. It was also fun, and the only Glock I have really liked.
Some machine pistols were made before the 1986 law went into effect. These are still transferable to individuals if Federal and State laws are followed. One of these is a Browning High Power. I'd like to get my hands on it, but don't have the thousands of dollars (mucho thousands) needed.
I've fired a full auto Glock 34. It was ported and relatively controllable. It was also fun, and the only Glock I have really liked.
Some machine pistols were made before the 1986 law went into effect. These are still transferable to individuals if Federal and State laws are followed. One of these is a Browning High Power. I'd like to get my hands on it, but don't have the thousands of dollars (mucho thousands) needed.
djh1765
Member
Why would anyone need a gun like that?
djh
djh
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2005
- Messages
- 8,017
- Reaction score
- 7,093
Can't answer that, but "need" is not an appropriate determining factor for gun ownership.
I mean, who really needs cars that can go faster than the speed limit, who really needs monster trucks, who really needs speed boats, who really needs a house over 1500 square feet, who really needs all sorts of things, etc., etc.
That gun is not something I would ever want, but more power to the guy who thinks it is fun (that person is just not me).
Matt Murphy
Member
I NEED one of those...bad. That is so cool and how much fun would that be? djh1765, I'm gonna guess that maybe you're an LEO and you're developing the "only cops should have guns attitude". I was a deputy for nearly 14 years and have always felt that everyone who is legally eligible and wants a firearm, should own one and practice with it alot. I'm not trying to offend but, don't get that elitist attitude.
djh1765
Member
Matt:
I am not offended and I am not getting the elitist attitude and I don't know what a LEO is but happen to be from the old school and at 71 years old don't agree with the Liberal thinking that if it feels good to me then it's my right to do it.
I carry any time I go outside the house but I do it within the law and that is why I have a CHL.
Sorry but thats just the way I feel. I realize its getting to the point that rules don't count for nothing anymore.
It's my right type of thing. I know many do not agree with me but so be it.
And I still say "Why would anyone need a gun like that"?
djh
I am not offended and I am not getting the elitist attitude and I don't know what a LEO is but happen to be from the old school and at 71 years old don't agree with the Liberal thinking that if it feels good to me then it's my right to do it.
I carry any time I go outside the house but I do it within the law and that is why I have a CHL.
Sorry but thats just the way I feel. I realize its getting to the point that rules don't count for nothing anymore.
It's my right type of thing. I know many do not agree with me but so be it.
And I still say "Why would anyone need a gun like that"?
djh
Out West
Member
I'd like to know what modifications are necessary to make a 3rd gen auto work like that. Just out of curiosity. Don't believe I would perform the modifications, but I like to know how things work.
If the creator of that 5906 TSW is reading this post, and you are willing, please send me an email with the details. Thanks.
Out West
If the creator of that 5906 TSW is reading this post, and you are willing, please send me an email with the details. Thanks.
Out West
varoadking
Member
Yes, I understand - that's why I mentioned that this was no malfunction - he was prepared...
Just like you said. We have a right to things like this and if we enjoy having a full auto 5906TSW we can have it. Its fun to shoot a full auto weapon. I have done this a number of times and loved it. I enjoy shooting semi-auto and any type of gun. Some folks have never been able to shoot a full auto weapon due to the state they live it. Its fun.
Similar threads
