UncleEd
Member
Media bias is far more obvious now than even 20 years ago, and it was bad then. I wish I could understand why. Nobody reports anything, they only editorialize and spin the news.
Ben Franklin deplored his journalistic rivals for being liars and scalawags of the worst sort for not agreeing with his every comment and report.
Nothing new.
Actual "unbiased" and straight reporting sans adjectives started to be more an objective after the beginning of the 20th Century, but you couldn't tell Hearst, McCormick, Pulitzer et. al.
that.
Oh, and in the tradition of news gathering, don't call a newspaperman a journalist because the very word "journalist"
implies the reality of interpretation. Few in the news business
just want to give the who, what, when, where, why and how
without embellishment. It doesn't build careers especially on TV.
Last edited: