h&r sportsman

I bought mine new in the early eighties. Still have it, very accurate and I believe it was the top of the line for H&R revolvers. The rear sight blade did fall out recently when my grandson was shooting it, but fortunately we found it on the shooting bench. I have shot many a rattler and many jack rabbits with it thru the years.
 
I also have a 5 shot snub H&R Defender in 38 S&W - I like, & highly recommend them all. They are small & light & fit most pockets.

As I have mentioned several times previously, I also have an H&R Defender (Model 925) in .38 S&W, ca. 1964. Mine has the 4" barrel, but it was also available with a 2" barrel, and that length is more common. I bought it at a gun show over 15 years ago for $100, and it was in nearly new condition, showing very little use. All I needed to do to it was to replace the hammer spring strut with an all-steel one. H&R screwed up in using a strut made using a Nylon tip, as they fail with age and use. The only other problem - well, not really a problem - is the windage-adjustable rear sight. Its two-screw design allows it to slip under recoil. I just got it set properly, then added a drop of Super Glue to keep the blade in place. It has never come loose. Elevation adjustment is done by adjusting the height of the front sight, and I had no problems with it. It shoots surprisingly tight groups at 15 yards, as good as my K-38. It is perhaps my favorite fun gun. I haven't seen one at a gun show for a long time.
hONvc4p.png
 
Last edited:
Mine is a slightly rarer 1932 Sportsman, the Model 199 SINGLE ACTION. 1932 was the first year of the Sportsman, this one is in excellent condition. The SA pull is phenomenal.

Gets rid of the heavy DA pull as there is no DA to pull. This is a VERY accurate revolver and imo should have been the only one offered as it brings out its potential, without the negatives of H&Rs DA design.

They were discontinued due to WW2.
 

Attachments

  • 20201128_000801.jpg
    20201128_000801.jpg
    76.7 KB · Views: 32
  • 20201128_000726.jpg
    20201128_000726.jpg
    99 KB · Views: 49
Last edited:
Here's my H&R "22 SPECIAL", circa 1935. Pretty cool revolver. Fit and finish are really nice for a lower priced depression era gun.
 

Attachments

  • 20211013_190947.jpg
    20211013_190947.jpg
    119.8 KB · Views: 24
  • 20211013_190342.jpg
    20211013_190342.jpg
    123 KB · Views: 31
  • 20211013_185942.jpg
    20211013_185942.jpg
    126.5 KB · Views: 21
I just bought this one this past wk.,

I just bought this one this past week, like new from another older collector. I have yet to shoot it, but I will always shoot in single action, much nicer trigger pull.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6743.jpg
    DSCF6743.jpg
    73.1 KB · Views: 27
As long as we're doing H&R, here's mine. It's an "Expert" .22lr 9-shot breaktop, with a 9" barrel. Although I've posted it before, I'll use any excuse to post it again, so here it is. Dad bought it around 1938, and it went unfired for 75 years. That's why it looks so good. It works perfectly, too.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • DSCN0590.jpg
    DSCN0590.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 280
My Dad had an H&R .22 when is was a pup about a 6” barrel. He kept it in his dresser drawer.
I ask you, what kid wouldn’t sneek a peak when he could? I never picked it up though. Just looked.
I seem to recall it was nickel plated or am I mis-remembering?

H&R did offer factory nickel 999s after WW2...I believe first in the 1950s IIRC, so maybe you aren't misremembering.

Then again, I thought for many years that my Dads H&R 929 Sidekick Slabside had ivory grips... when I saw them again after Dads passing...they were Franzite. :) :)
 

Attachments

  • 20201128_001532.jpg
    20201128_001532.jpg
    113.9 KB · Views: 31
H&R did offer factory nickel 999s after WW2...I believe first in the 1950s IIRC, so maybe you aren't misremembering.

Then again, I thought for many years that my Dads H&R 929 Sidekick Slabside had ivory grips... when I saw them again after Dads passing...they were Franzite. :) :)

Yeah, well, he came back from Korea in 54 so maybe it was.
He sold it off way back when.
Maybe he knew I was peeking.
 
Glad I reviewed this subject again - always good to see others with similar tastes. I came across two H&R .38 defenders, when I got mine - & gave one to my Daughter for emergencies = faster & cheaper than a Cell Phone. Love my long & short 22LRs as well. My 999 is a 1941 in used - but fine shooting condition
I used to own a pair of WWII surplus .45acp MK VI Webleys + a previously modified for carry, .45acp MkV - the only one I can find a picture of - all are gone but not forgotten. C.
 

Attachments

  • MY Webley-Mark-V-45-ACP_101544881_85483_FA8CC42C4D2FEC5A.jpg
    MY Webley-Mark-V-45-ACP_101544881_85483_FA8CC42C4D2FEC5A.jpg
    103.6 KB · Views: 26
  • 100_4191.jpg
    100_4191.jpg
    118.7 KB · Views: 25
Last edited:
FWIW, I never set out to accumulate breaktop .22's.

The IJ ' Sealed Eight' (with the world's tiniest sights) was given to me.
The H&R M999 6" (dated c.1970) I got from a friend that remained working p/t at an LGS I had recently left due to moving away.

They both shoot very accurately, and both have terrible DA triggers.

I just like the fact that these were 'working man's' .22 revolvers back in their day and priced quite a bit lower than a S&W or Colt offering.
And - we will never see their like again. Any lower priced new handgun now is made of zinc and plastic.
 

Attachments

  • thumbnail (2).jpg
    thumbnail (2).jpg
    164.6 KB · Views: 27
My very first revolver was an H&R .22 Model 929 “Sidekick.” It had a fairly short barrel, maybe 3” but I am not sure, and a nine-chamber cylinder. I bought it back in the late 1950s from a neighbor. He worked for a local slaughterhouse, and part of his job was to drive a cattle truck to pick up livestock from nearby farms and auctions. Occasionally he had to kill something in the truck and bleed it out before returning to the slaughterhouse, and that is what he used the revolver for. Anyway, he changed his employment and didn’t need the revolver, so he sold it to me for around $25. It was in very good condition and showed little use, no blood damage to the finish. I actually used that 929 in some indoor .22 Bullseye competition in the early 1960s. I didn’t do very well with it, but I shot what I had, as I couldn’t afford anything better. I gave it to my wife-to-be before we married, and she later gave it to her brother. I have no idea where it went after that. I would like to run across another one like it just for the memories.
 
Last edited:
An old thread relived, and an interesting topic.
The H&R Sportsman 999 made available a .22 revolver to a lot of folks that otherwise couldn't afford one.

No they weren't Smiths or Colts but they worked well if not pressed into severe service.

Some used the one piece grip design that was easily detachable with a screw thru the lower section. They offered different grip styles. The same as the H&R Single Shot Target pistol. I believe the grip was Ropers idea.

The hand spring in these is a simple piece of spring wire (music wire) and often is weak or needs a re-bend to better provide tension for better functioning.

As mentioned, they do have a tendency to spit lead at the cyl gap. Not the precision made machine the other top mfg's made.

I bought a damaged 999 once for $10. Bulged bore and other issues.
A 1948 mfg but in otherwise great condition finish wise.
Relined it, fixed the mechanics. But it always still occasionally spit lead.
I even re-re-lined the bore out of curiousity that the liner job I had performed was bad. Same results, different day.

But it shoots rather well and to this day it still does rainy day duty with a new owner. He taught his young daughters to handgun shoot with it as well.

I offered to re-re-resleeve the revolver to a straight thru design elliminating the revolver and making it a single shot. No more spitting!.
The liner would go thru the bore and right thru one of the chambers of the cylinder which would be made static in place. I even considered 32S&W Long for the SS conversion.
But he said he liked it as a .22 revolver. So the $20 .22 revolver lives on.
 
Those old top-break H&R revolvers are really fun shooters. This "22 SPECIAL" dates to around 1935. For a budget revolver, the fit and finish are amazing. Pretty accurate even with the rudimentary sights.
 

Attachments

  • 20211013_190947.jpg
    20211013_190947.jpg
    119.7 KB · Views: 14
  • 20211013_190342.jpg
    20211013_190342.jpg
    122.8 KB · Views: 15
  • 20211013_185942.jpg
    20211013_185942.jpg
    126.4 KB · Views: 12
One of those guns that I lusted for while viewing the Shooters Bible back before I could buy a handgun. I just knew it was the best gun you could buy.

I did get one many years later. A 6" barrel one, with a missing rear sight blade (couldn't find a replacement anywhere). I got to where I could hit cans with it just using the front sight and the rear of the frame, but I never really warmed up to it because of the 6" barrel. I really wanted a 4" one. I kept it a while, then sold it off to someone else.

I actually found out I prefered the High Standard Sentinel (with a 4" barrel) later on.
 
Back
Top