Tom Goodrick
Member
I just fired my converted M&P 357. I can fire it with very good accuracy (for me). I shot 20 rounds with my Ruger SR40C and then shot 30 rounds of 357 Sig using my old M&P 40 FS converted with a change to a new S&W 357 Sig barrel. I did much better with the 357 than with the Ruger on this particular day. (I used to shoot the 40 S&W M&P better than the Ruger.)
I appreciate the fact that S&W had the foresight to put the only caliber stamp on the barrel as viewed through the ejection port. My gun looks no different than a "factory-made" M&P 357. It will be permanent 357. I will not be switching back and forth between 40 and 357. I have another gun for .40 which I use for CC. The 357 will be used for home defense.
The recoil was no big deal. It seems rather impressive when combined with the loud and sharp report from the 357. The holes in the target are nice and round as though burned through. Holes for the 40 are a little raggedy.
I shot 125 gr Speer Lawman FMJ. I intend to shoot 125 gr JHP for defense - probably Speer Gold Dot.
I appreciate the fact that S&W had the foresight to put the only caliber stamp on the barrel as viewed through the ejection port. My gun looks no different than a "factory-made" M&P 357. It will be permanent 357. I will not be switching back and forth between 40 and 357. I have another gun for .40 which I use for CC. The 357 will be used for home defense.
The recoil was no big deal. It seems rather impressive when combined with the loud and sharp report from the 357. The holes in the target are nice and round as though burned through. Holes for the 40 are a little raggedy.
I shot 125 gr Speer Lawman FMJ. I intend to shoot 125 gr JHP for defense - probably Speer Gold Dot.