Shrek Of The Arctic
Member
- Joined
- May 22, 2019
- Messages
- 287
- Reaction score
- 933
I'm a fan of the scout rifle. I've had some very nice ones in the past. I don't know that I'd say "No" to one even now. Especially an original Steyr, although I really like the current Savages and Rugers as well.
In some ways, the parameters of a scout rifle still elude us, such as the 6.5 lb weight limit. In other ways, such as optics most of the goals intended are achieved quite gloriously with red dots, magnifiers, LPVOs, etc.
Of course, one of the goals of the forward mounted optic was to have easy access for loading and unloading, perhaps even with stripper clips, as I recall. On many bolt action rifles, this is a moot point, due to enclosed push feed actions anyways. And with the advent of 5,10, 20 round mags...adapting mags from AR 10s for example, it hardly seems as critical as it would have been back in the day of Remington 600s and 660s.
Lightweight, quick handling, medium range, medium caliber. That sounds to me alot like a Ruger American with a LPVO or even a decent red dot on it.
The thought of it's versatility is certainly legit. It does seem to have been built with a more romanticized one man vs. the world notion in mind. That doesn't really quite match the thinking of our modern world. Having said that, I went through a time when we were pretty dang broke and an earlier Savage Scout rifle fed my family. I also knew I was far from unarmed and helpless with it propped near my bed. So while the one gun notion seems to pretty much be a fantasy or a hypothetical exercise for us active gun nuts, I think a fella could do much worse than a Scout rifle.
With all the technology thrown out there these days, I still don't think a semi auto can ever be as light and nimble as an appropriate bolt gun.
One of my biggest scout rifle issues would be shooting it. Ammo has become outrageously priced, even for reloading. I paid $62 for a pound of Unique the other day! Not rifle powder, but I'm sure you get the gist.
If only Col. Cooper were here to lend his thoughts...
Me...I sadly think the world is moving on from the Scout Rifle concept. Semi auto rifles reign supreme. Many popular bolt actions no longer have stocks, but a "chassis" to my eyes a chassis kinda looks like a stock, but it weighs 2-3 times as much, and costs up to ten times as much. Most guys I know claim to be 1K-2K yard shooters, utilize bipods, 30x scopes, etc. Now...that ain't to speak ill of the precision crowd...but it sure ain't to be mixed up with the concept of a scout rifle.
Now me....I would love to see the scout rifle reconsidered. With the lightweight carbon fiber barrels, the range of optics, magazines, calibers
...I think it's possible to make the scout rifle better than we ever imagined back in the day.
I'd be curious what y'all think.
In some ways, the parameters of a scout rifle still elude us, such as the 6.5 lb weight limit. In other ways, such as optics most of the goals intended are achieved quite gloriously with red dots, magnifiers, LPVOs, etc.
Of course, one of the goals of the forward mounted optic was to have easy access for loading and unloading, perhaps even with stripper clips, as I recall. On many bolt action rifles, this is a moot point, due to enclosed push feed actions anyways. And with the advent of 5,10, 20 round mags...adapting mags from AR 10s for example, it hardly seems as critical as it would have been back in the day of Remington 600s and 660s.
Lightweight, quick handling, medium range, medium caliber. That sounds to me alot like a Ruger American with a LPVO or even a decent red dot on it.
The thought of it's versatility is certainly legit. It does seem to have been built with a more romanticized one man vs. the world notion in mind. That doesn't really quite match the thinking of our modern world. Having said that, I went through a time when we were pretty dang broke and an earlier Savage Scout rifle fed my family. I also knew I was far from unarmed and helpless with it propped near my bed. So while the one gun notion seems to pretty much be a fantasy or a hypothetical exercise for us active gun nuts, I think a fella could do much worse than a Scout rifle.
With all the technology thrown out there these days, I still don't think a semi auto can ever be as light and nimble as an appropriate bolt gun.
One of my biggest scout rifle issues would be shooting it. Ammo has become outrageously priced, even for reloading. I paid $62 for a pound of Unique the other day! Not rifle powder, but I'm sure you get the gist.
If only Col. Cooper were here to lend his thoughts...
Me...I sadly think the world is moving on from the Scout Rifle concept. Semi auto rifles reign supreme. Many popular bolt actions no longer have stocks, but a "chassis" to my eyes a chassis kinda looks like a stock, but it weighs 2-3 times as much, and costs up to ten times as much. Most guys I know claim to be 1K-2K yard shooters, utilize bipods, 30x scopes, etc. Now...that ain't to speak ill of the precision crowd...but it sure ain't to be mixed up with the concept of a scout rifle.
Now me....I would love to see the scout rifle reconsidered. With the lightweight carbon fiber barrels, the range of optics, magazines, calibers
...I think it's possible to make the scout rifle better than we ever imagined back in the day.
I'd be curious what y'all think.