dougb1946
Member
USA would consider database a vital component of homeland security.
Firearms may be considered and existential threat to the state and public safety because they can be used to threaten the citizens and power of the state.
ANYTHING that threatens the power of the state is to be considered a risk in risk analysis. New tech, new social behaviors, groups etc.
It is what China does and what any state will do to protect it's people and it's existence.
I think such a database IS the goal of the democrats and certain government agencies. It is only bad if they decide to use it to eviscerate our rights.
This is why we have to be engaged in government EVERY day.
The founders feared an overly powerful and intrusive federal government. The 2A was seen as a way of ensuring the states were able to counterbalance the power of the federal govt. Letting the feds change the rules kind of defeats the whole purpose. It's not like money was speech or corporations were people or that we had a DHS watching all or that we let super pacs sway elections, or even had a Patriots Act.