help with a detective story that im writing

For something different, how about a Walther TPH as a BUG? It comes in blue or stainless, .22 LR or .25 ACP. Sort of looks like a smaller version of a PPK and very thin and concealable. It can be carried in a shirt pocket. I used to carry a blue .22 LR as a BUG until they told me I couldn't carry it because it was too small.
 
I like the idea of the M-1 30 carbine for someone in a chair. The wheels would not need to be locked for recoil and with a paratrooper stock it could be hidden along the back frame under a coat.
 
As a published mystery writer, I only have one piece of advice for you. Write about what you know about. If you don't know about crime, criminals and firearms, perhaps you should select a topic you are more familar with.
 
True, it helps to write about what you know....but if it weren't for research, the only books ever writen would be autobiographies....and very few people have lives worth reading about....:)

510X674F18L._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 
Wheelchair bound Investigator:
Primary handgun:S&W Model 629 6"
Secondary handgun: Colt Combat Commander .45acp
Rifle: Ruger Mini-14 .223 w/folding stock
Other weapons: straight razor and a hand grenade.
a cell phone, GPS, and a flashlight is a must.

***conceilment is not an issue on a wheelchair.
The wheelchair could also be a portable toilet.
Heavy armament is a must as a wheelchair bound person has to fight from his wheelchair. If this is a motorize chair then have it "Soaped up".
 
Strangely enough, some states regulate what calibers and types of handguns are allowed for carry when one has a PI lisc.

Kahr makes a modernized "tactical" M1 carbine, I had one of mine set up quite similar to it. The advantage over the old paratrooper carbines and copies there of is primarily that the stock will lock open. It uses a rather nice Choate folder with a recoil pad. Not that an M1 carbine kicks all that much, but the pad can help the gun with gun handling.

Carbines seem to sell mostly in states with restrictive laws (which would also restrict the tactical model carbine I supposer), to WW2 reenactors and to those who like nostalgia. Most people that want a carbine end up with an M4 type weapon.

But the carbine and primary handgun could be rolled virtually into one. So long as someone is able to pull back the slide, one of the FN 5.7 pistols ought be just the trick. They've been marketed to women and the physically infirm as of late owing to relatively sedate recoil.

Another choice would be a Beretta Model 84. These are hi cap .380s that are a bit large in some ways, but essentially recoil free.

Most armed professionals no longer carry revolvers as a primary weapon. Short bbl .357s are particularly uncommon. Too much muzzle blast/recoil/what not for what they have to offer. The .357 Sig chambered autos - delivering the same or better ballistics - have largely displaced them for those who want to match the classic 125gr JHP magnum ballistics.
 
Why would your private detective carry a small gun when he's in a wheel chair? Some kind of high capacity auto with extra mags and another one of the same for weak-hand access if he has to carry a second gun at all. May as well be able to use the same ammo and mags for both.

As far as a long gun, shorty shotguns are way cooler for detectives than any kind of carbine. Plus you can get all kinds of different rounds...flachettes, incendiary, slug, shot, less lethal, etc....
 
Why would a young modern day detective carry a revolver? I don't think the youth of today would have anything to do with one. He would probably have a third generation Glock 17 and a Keltec .380 as his back up.
 
Research is better, when you live it, like the likes of Jack London, or Ernest Hemingway. Most people that write usually have one or two good books in them. That's because their life experiences have been limited. I've had some favorite authors, but most of their books are more or less fomula, and over time I've discarded them. People that base their work on research sooner or later, get something wrong. It's like a Professor that went from college to teaching. Everything he knows comes from books. No life experience to know if who ever wrote the book knew what he was talking about. I loved teachers who worked in their field. They brought a lot to the classroom when they could tell you what parts of the textbook you could discard as ****.
 
As a published mystery writer, I only have one piece of advice for you. Write about what you know about. If you don't know about crime, criminals and firearms, perhaps you should select a topic you are more familar with.

Research is better, when you live it, like the likes of Jack London, or Ernest Hemingway. Most people that write usually have one or two good books in them. That's because their life experiences have been limited. I've had some favorite authors, but most of their books are more or less fomula, and over time I've discarded them. People that base their work on research sooner or later, get something wrong. It's like a Professor that went from college to teaching. Everything he knows comes from books. No life experience to know if who ever wrote the book knew what he was talking about. I loved teachers who worked in their field. They brought a lot to the classroom when they could tell you what parts of the textbook you could discard as ****.

There's a lot of good advice here in my opinion. Your books' success will depend greatly on who it is targeted for and who is actually reading it. I'm not an author by the way, just a professional reader.

Years ago, when working as a security guard, I picked up a book at the local used book store to read at work. It started off alright, ...it was set in Japan and gave great detail about the firearms the two Japanese bodyguards were carrying, one had a S&W revolver and the other had a Colt 1911 as I recall. They were both murdered, along with their big business executive boss, by ninjas, one of which the hero of the story immediately knew was an American because one of the above bodies had a Cold Steel Knife in him, which was made in America. Page two and I threw it in the trash can, never to read another fictional book again.

I have also read many how-to gunfighting books by authors that have never been in a gun fight, but will not waste my time, or money on them anymore.

I'm not trying to tell you to not to write your book, but am just suggesting you don't try to describe things in more detail than you could without asking for advice. In other words, what would you carry, and why?
 
Maybe Calvin finds a gun in the bottom back corner of his departed grandfather's safe that no one knew was there... everyone thought the safe was empty... a gun that will help Calvin out of a unique situation in the story. How about something like this?



A detective in a wheel chair needs a ring gun, right?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top