HELP WITH HIGHWAY PATROLMAN STAMPINGS

mentallapse

Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2008
Messages
27
Reaction score
36
I recently purchased a Highway Patrolman. Between the cylinder and the trigger it is stamped PROPERTY OF HIGH STD MFG CORP R & D. R &D is also on the barrel and one more place. Just wondering what the relationship is with High Standard? Any input would be appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • S&W R & D 001.jpg
    S&W R & D 001.jpg
    209.8 KB · Views: 235
  • S&W R & D 006.jpg
    S&W R & D 006.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 261
  • S&W R & D 007.jpg
    S&W R & D 007.jpg
    72.4 KB · Views: 220
Register to hide this ad
I would letter that one. There's a good chance it was sent directly to High Standard from S&W.
 
Could there be another "High Standard Corporation" other than the gun maker?

PS: The gun maker doesn't call itself by this name. It's "High Standard Manufacturing."
 
Maybe a hardness test mark on the breech end of the bbl.

H/S did bring out their own c/f revolver (Crusader?) at some point. Not unusual for one mfg to have examples of competitors products in their brain room to pick apart.

It's (was) also fairly common for one mfg to make parts for another.
Marlin for example made Rugers bbls for the first years of Ruger production.
 
Just wondering what the relationship is with High Standard? Any input would be appreciated.

It could have been used by security guards at the High Standard factory, and stamped just as other S&Ws were stamped for various law enforcement agencies and security firms. To the best of my knowledge, High Standard didn't make large caliber revolvers, as their .22 revolvers and pistols seemed to provide them plenty of revenue.

Or perhaps High Standard had considered getting into the large-caliber revolver market, but after doing R&D using other manufacturers' revolvers (like S&W) for comparision and testing, their management just decided they couldn't compete in that market and be cost effective, and gave up on the idea. I mean, by the time the Model 28 came into production, the law enforcement and military markets were totally dominated by S&W and Colt...and face it, to get into that market, High Standard would have had to do a lot of retooling and a lot of hiring of competent craftsmen. It would have taken them years, probably, to have become competitive in those markets.

All this is conjecture on my part, of course.

It would definitely be worth the time and money to get this one lettered.

EDIT: I stand corrected on High Standard not making large caliber revolvers. I've found references to and photos of their Crusader revolver in .45 Colt and .44 Magnum.

In fact, there's a 50th Anniversary (1927-1977) Crusader in .44 Magnum up for auction right now with an original box dated August 15, 1979. It has a 6.5-inch barrel, and is Revolver #96 out of 500. It was apparently also offered with an 8 3/8-inch barrel. I had no idea these guns ever existed. Amazing what you can stumble across. It's a beautiful and interesting-looking revolver. It has a cylinder release that appears to move up and down. The rear sight is adjustable and the front sight looks to be a Baughman.

I wouldn't mind having the gun, myself.
 
Last edited:
The fact that it is stamped R&D would argue against its use by security guards. I suspect it was used for comparison purposes in the development of High Standard revolvers. I too would definitely be requesting a letter on this one.
Fascinating!
 
The fact that it is stamped R&D would argue against its use by security guards.

Yeah, I've pretty much discounted that idea the deeper I look into this. It was just an idea.
 
I recently purchased a Highway Patrolman. Between the cylinder and the trigger it is stamped PROPERTY OF HIGH STD MFG CORP R & D. R &D is also on the barrel and one more place. Just wondering what the relationship is with High Standard? Any input would be appreciated.

It's an S-series serial number? Have you run the number to see when it may have been manufactured?
 
Im with the rest of the Crowd...You have a VERY neat revolver there...

please get a Letter on it...Sounds like a Cool Piece...

Congrats
 
HIGHWAY PATROLMAN SERIAL NUMBER

The serial number is S 119004. It still has the sideplate screw. My guess, it was made in 1954 or 1955.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A10
Ok I'll be the forum idiot tonight.....how can you tell the extractor rod has RH threads from those 3 photos. Someone please educate me:):)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

+1 on that.
 
Ok I'll be the forum idiot tonight.....how can you tell the extractor rod has RH threads from those 3 photos. Someone please educate me
Look at the knurled end of the extractor rod. There is no gap between the knurling and the rest of the rod. When S&W reversed the threads on K and N frame revolvers (around 1959) they put a little smooth area that is slightly smaller diameter than the rod, just aft of the knurled area. This identifies a rod with the new left hand threads.
So it really takes only a glance to know what direction the extractor threads go.

And you are not an "idiot." We all had to learn these things at some point. And this is the beauty of studying and collecting S&W revolvers. There is so darn much to learn!
 
Here's a photo, showing the rod tip after the threads were reversed to left hand. This example is on a Model 14-2.
jp-ak-albums-k-frame-target-revolvers-picture10842-model-14-2.jpg


Now here is another K frame - a Combat Masterpiece from 1952. This gun has right hand threads.
jp-ak-albums-k-frame-target-revolvers-picture10692-right-side-mshp-5-combat-masterpiece-shipped-october-3-1952.jpg
 
I too wondered how you could tell that from 3 photos and I have been playing this game since 1972. Sooooo much to learn and remember.

I own S129113 that shipped in April of 1955 so late 54 or early 55 is probably a safe WAG.

One of the main reasons that S&W did not care about shipping in serial number sequence was to keep competitors on their toes. It made it difficult to guesstimate exactly how many guns S&W was selling when serial numbers were all over the place.

I hope that you do letter the gun and let us know however, I also hope that when you bought the gun you did not pay extra for the stamping. My 28 is only a metal stamp kit away from being owned by Colt's R&D department. :eek:

Always buy the gun and not the story.
 
  • Like
Reactions: A10
Re Post #12: The Crusader was a High Standard product. They pre-sold a number of them, I think 500 each .44 and .45 and it took years for them to build them.

There were some centerfire Sentinel revolvers that were made for HS by Dan Wesson. Not the same thing.
 
Back
Top