How did I do?

Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
32,591
Reaction score
31,265
Location
(outside) Charleston, SC
I just replied to a comment by a gun grabber on CBS news. Did I do all right?:

Some of us care about the right to enjoy a recreational sport like shooting without people like you telling us we are wrong to do so. Either people agree with you or they are 'child killers'. My guns have absolutely nothing to do with killing anybody, they are locked in my safe unless they are with me at the target range. What constitutes an arsenal or how much ammunition is too much? I have a rifle, semi auto pistol, revolver and a shotgun with several hundred rounds of ammunition. Shooting a couple of hundred rounds of ammunition would be a slow day for me at the range. Your limiting my ammunition wouldn't do one iota for curbing violence in this country that goes far deeper than gun ownership. What it will do is make it difficult or impossible for me to enjoy a wholesome hobby. But that would be good for you, right?

-------

Take that!:D
 
Register to hide this ad
Well presented ... focus on basics that opponents ignore
 
I have yet to figure out how to offset the damage caused by the press to our 2A rights. The other night on Fox News Watch, the panel of five (including 2 liberals) all agreed that most of the press was left of Obama on gun control vs the 2nd Amendment. The point they were making is that the media largely doesn't discuss the real issues, just a highly biased view of gun control. It is the "dirty" Amendment. And for a lot of citizens, that is all they see or hear about it.
 
Last edited:
I have yet to figure out how to offset the damage caused by the press to our 2A rights. The other night on Fox News Watch, the panel of five (including 2 liberals) all agreed that the most of the press was left of Obama on gun control vs the
2nd Amendment. The point they were making is that the media largely doesn't discuss the real issues, just a highly biased view of gun control. It is the "dirty" Amendment. And for a lot of citizens, that is all they see or hear about it.

My question for America's "journalists" is this: When you succeed in helping the government disarm the citizenry, who will you turn to when the government sets its sights on your freedom of the press?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top