How do you identify a South African Victory Model?

Sorry Linda, I was a bit slapdash there; the first delivery from the first order, after S&W started again following diversion of the earlier production to the UK, was 2200 revolvers.

UDF number 112 is S/N 693675, and not 693673 as you typed.
S/N 690876 has UDF number 811,

No, S/N 721300 cannot have been in the first shipment because its UDF number is 10538.

Unfortunately no record of the correlation between S/N and UDF number has survived. One can only work from examples seen or mentioned in the archives for some other reason. For example, S/N 697032 UDF 3822 was "found in the possession of a native in Zanzibar" in 1942!

Peter
 
South african issue of the S&W 38/200

Hi all, im in south africa, trying to find more info on a revolver of a friend who inherited it from her father when i stumbled accross this topic. Interesting is that what i hold in my hand (38/200 1942/3 victory model, seems to contradic most of the descriptions you guys are chatting about.
This is a 5" victory model, issued to SA police, but it has the austrian police stamp on it. I'd love to share more info and will post pics if anyone is interested?
 
Hi all, im in south africa, trying to find more info on a revolver of a friend who inherited it from her father when i stumbled accross this topic. Interesting is that what i hold in my hand (38/200 1942/3 victory model, seems to contradic most of the descriptions you guys are chatting about.
This is a 5" victory model, issued to SA police, but it has the austrian police stamp on it. I'd love to share more info and will post pics if anyone is interested?

It could happen. Many .38/200 BSRs were issued to German and Austrian civil police units during the occupation period after WWII. The German and Austrian police eventually disposed of them. Some could have found their way into South African police service. Make up your own story. 5" barrels would have been correct from about 1941 and later for a .38/200.
 
This is a 5" victory model, issued to SA police, but it has the austrian police stamp on it.

I assume that it is marked SAP? Does it have any British civilian proof marks on it?

The SAP clearly purchased surplus 5" 38 S&W "Victory" pistols from UK commercial sources around 1960. All the SAP marked guns that I have seen carry Birmingham commercial proofs and I believe that Parker Hale were the source. Quite how an Austrian police marked specimen ended up here is a good question.

Peter
 
South African pre-Victory 4" .38 S&W

CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-01-1.jpg


CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-07.jpg


Collecting-SmithampWessonVictories-SmithampWessonPre-VictorySouthAfrican4inch38SampWdeliveredtoSouthAfrica-004_zps5a91f06f.jpg


Collecting-SmithampWessonVictories-SmithampWessonPre-VictorySouthAfrican4inch38SampWdeliveredtoSouthAfrica-003_zps51070905.jpg




South African pre-Victory 4" .38 S&W

cfdea133-386b-46a6-adce-98a7abf0b54e_zps36077944.jpg


cf8202a3-7473-4b6e-b719-e84a858f7e97_zps36cc2a8b.jpg


CCWsSmithWessonPreVictorymodel38SW-FactoryLetter-002-1.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-005.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-006.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-003.jpg
 
Lobo

As I am sure you know, the grips on your South African 4" S/N 72005 are post-war. The correct ones are on the second gun you show.

However, that second gun is NOT a South African one, despite the factory letter. As you will see in one of my previous posts in this thread, no S&Ws came to this country until August 1940. What you clearly have is one of the May 1940 diversions to Britain. This also explains the lack of the Arrow in U Union Defence Force property mark and the post war Birmingham commercial proof marks. It is of course an interesting piece of early "38/200 S&W" history.

Peter
 
Yes sir, I'm with you on both accounts ;)

Why were the guns diverted back? Was it due to Dunkirk?

If I got a factory letter on the South African 4" SN # 72005 do you know if it would letter like the 4" SN # 685147


Lobo

As I am sure you know, the grips on your South African 4" S/N 72005 are post-war. The correct ones are on the second gun you show.

However, that second gun is NOT a South African one, despite the factory letter. As you will see in one of my previous posts in this thread, no S&Ws came to this country until August 1940. What you clearly have is one of the May 1940 diversions to Britain. This also explains the lack of the Arrow in U Union Defence Force property mark and the post war Birmingham commercial proof marks. It is of course an interesting piece of early "38/200 S&W" history.

Peter
 
"There was a passenger/cargo ship named "City of New York" that was part of Farrell's American South African Lines. It ran the NY-South Africa route and was sunk by torpedo on it's way from Mozambique to NY in 1942."

Probably not if it was an American flag ship. Due to the Neutrality Act of 1939, American flag ships could not legally carry war material cargo to combatants until 1941. I think the "free alongside ship New York" simply means that the manufacturer would handle shipment to the Port of New York for loading onto whatever foreign flag cargo ship was to be used.
 
South African pre-Victory 4" .38 S&W

CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-01-1.jpg


CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-07.jpg


Collecting-SmithampWessonVictories-SmithampWessonPre-VictorySouthAfrican4inch38SampWdeliveredtoSouthAfrica-004_zps5a91f06f.jpg


Collecting-SmithampWessonVictories-SmithampWessonPre-VictorySouthAfrican4inch38SampWdeliveredtoSouthAfrica-003_zps51070905.jpg




South African pre-Victory 4" .38 S&W

cfdea133-386b-46a6-adce-98a7abf0b54e_zps36077944.jpg


cf8202a3-7473-4b6e-b719-e84a858f7e97_zps36cc2a8b.jpg


CCWsSmithWessonPreVictorymodel38SW-FactoryLetter-002-1.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-005.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-006.jpg


CCWMEWsSmithWessonPre-Victory4in38SWcaliber-003.jpg


That lower gun is pretty rough. Is it the one "found in the possession of a native in Zanzibar"? :D

I'm quite sure that a .38-200 is South African if it has a stamp by the cylinder release that reads, "Maak hier oop". ("Open here", from Afrikaans, if I recall a marking on an envelope correctly. Sorry: couldn't resist. ;)
 
South African- Austrian 38/200

South African- Austrian 38/200
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    160.4 KB · Views: 33
South African- Austrian 38/200

South African- Austrian 38/200
 

Attachments

  • image.jpg
    image.jpg
    131.5 KB · Views: 33
I know this thread is on the older side, but I acquired a revolver yesterday that relates. It is a little on the rough side to include either a broken or bobbed hammer. The final auction price including tax and buyers premium was $240.00.

The serial number is 720750.

The left side of the barrel is marked BNP under a crown stamp followed by .38 .767". Below this is 3 1/2 TONS PER []" (actually the [] is a stamped square box) I assume this is three and one half tons per square inch. Then below this line is SMITH & WESSON.

The patent dates are across the top of the barrel along with SMITH & WESSON SPRINGFIELD, MASS.

The right side of the barrel simply states .38 S&W CTG.

BNP under a crown is also repeated on the frame between the forcing cone and the barrel.

On the frame, behind the hammer (back strap) is stamped with what appears to be 16 B" 745 (hard to read). Below this is a large shaped U with an arrow in the center of it. The arrow is facing upward. Below this is larger numbers 8933.

The cylinder also as BNP under a crown stamp. The serial number is stamped under the barrel and on the bottom of the butt.

A large S&W oval stamp is on the right side of the frame along with the typical MADE IN U.S.A. marking.

The barrel is closer to 3 and 13/16" in length. I measured from the end of the barrel to the cylinder. I understand S&W considers this a 4" barrel.

The grips appear to be original and have the matching serial number stamped on the interior of the right side grip.

On another forum, others consider this a pre-Victory model shipped to South Africa. Some believe the British markings were later added by England and somehow the revolver ended up in England after service in South Africa. I think I will contact Roy Jinks for a letter to see if it adds any clarity.

Attached is a picture which does reflect the poor condition.
 

Attachments

  • Model11.jpg
    Model11.jpg
    227.7 KB · Views: 30
These 4" British Service Revolvers were originally ordered for South Africa, but they were diverted to England. The BNP and other proof stamps were added when it was sold into the commercial firearms market in the 1950s, and are not acceptance marks when they were purchased/first issued.
 
Below this is a large shaped U with an arrow in the center of it. The arrow is facing upward. Below this is larger numbers 8933.

Yes, this was a South African direct purchase from S&W. The Arrow in U was the Union Defence Force property mark, and all the S&W revolvers were given a serial number stamped below the mark on receipt by Pretoria. Deliveries were not in serial number order. My records show S/N 720539 had UDF number 1966 and S/N 720913 had UDF number 11591.

Your revolver clearly ended up in Britain and had to have commercial proofing to be legal for civilian owenership/sale, hence the post 1955 Birmingham proof marks. However, quite how or why it reached Britian is a mystery because the UDF did not dispose of its S&W revolvers until the 1980s. They had been replaced with Star Model BS 9 mm pistols in the mid 1960s, but were held in reserve. Of course some were liberated and others legally disposed of retiring officers, etc.

This is the first example of a UDF marked S&W with British proof that I have come across.

Peter
 
Thanks for this information, I recall reading none of these 4" revolvers reached South Africa but some obviously did.
 
Factory Letter made it in a while back for this Union of South Africa Pre-Victory model 38/200. Minus the grips, the gun is all numbers matching. The only British mark I can find is a crown located below the cylinder on the right side of the gun.


FactoryLetterFeb202015005_zps488cf9bf.jpg



CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-06.jpg



CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-12.jpg



CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-09.jpg



CCWsSmithWessonVictoryPre-VictorySAfricandelivered11112-03.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the additional insight.

I am assuming the correct identification for the revolver is a "Pre-Model 11", although I have heard it called a "Pre-Victory Model". It seems most terms might be accurate as a description but not as a model in and of itself.

There seems to be conflicting views as to whether the revolver was sent to England first and then to South Africa or whether it was shipped to South Africa and then found it way to England. ??

I think I will go ahead and send a "Letter" request off to Mr. Jinks.

I have read here where someone or some group on the Forum maintain a serial number data base? How can I alert them to this serial number and other data on this revolver. I can post other picture if needed to include the back strap South African stamping.
 
I am assuming the correct identification for the revolver is a "Pre-Model 11", although I have heard it called a "Pre-Victory Model". It seems most terms might be accurate as a description but not as a model in and of itself.

I have read here where someone or some group on the Forum maintain a serial number data base? How can I alert them to this serial number and other data on this revolver.
I can post other picture if needed to include the back strap South African stamping.

LamarW:

In this instance the better description for collector purposes is "Pre-Victory".

Yes, another collector, LWCmdr45 and I, have maintained the Victory Model Database for many years. Thank you for supplying the data on your revolver.

The pic of the backstrap would be useful.

Also, if you receive a factory letter on your revolver please post it back here for addition to the Database.
 
I know this is a very old thread. I just wanted to share my 1905 4th change, pre Victory Model South African in 38 Special.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8555.jpg
    IMG_8555.jpg
    91.3 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_8556.jpg
    IMG_8556.jpg
    91.7 KB · Views: 10
  • IMG_8559.jpg
    IMG_8559.jpg
    79.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_8564.jpg
    IMG_8564.jpg
    63.6 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_8562.jpg
    IMG_8562.jpg
    64 KB · Views: 11
I know this is a very old thread. I just wanted to share my 1905 4th change, pre Victory Model South African in 38 Special.

Does this one have matching barrel and cylinder numbers? As I recall, all of the South African contract revolvers were in .38 S & W and the majority had 4" barrels.
 
.38 S&W M&P help, please (Updated with letter)

Let add my little bit to the resurrection.

There are photos in the linked thread. My 4" .38 S&W letters to South Africa. It somehow avoided all the usual hieroglyphics, either by never going anywhere or coming back outside of the usual channels.

Somehow it wound up with Cripple Creek PD, and then with me.
 
I believe the barrel itself is a replacement as it has no British proof marks on it. It looks like I've got a post war conversion.
 
I believe the barrel itself is a replacement as it has no British proof marks on it. It looks like I've got a post war conversion.

It is a post war conversion with British commercial proof marks. South Africa never received any 38 Special M&Ps and the UDF number places your gun firmly in the 4" category. 5" gun UDF numbers start around 15000.

Peter
 
Back
Top