I've always found the Colt V spring models to shoot very well and normally have a wonderful action.
I am a Colt fan.
That said, I'm also a Smith fan. I currently own one Colt and about 15 Smiths. Guess that says a lot.
The L frame is an absolute good. My 586 is a fantastic shooter. The action is slicker than snot on a doorknob.
IMO, Smith really got it right with the L frame.
If they wanted something to compete with the Python-sized Colt .357s they succeeded.
For me, the advantages of a Smith over a Colt are that the Smiths are easy to work on and have worked on (and done right), and to get parts for.
Any other advantages they may have are just a bonus.
Just like the Ruger GP100, I hated the L frames when I was growing up.
Then, I shot them. And bought them.
Long live the L frame.
I am a Colt fan.
That said, I'm also a Smith fan. I currently own one Colt and about 15 Smiths. Guess that says a lot.
The L frame is an absolute good. My 586 is a fantastic shooter. The action is slicker than snot on a doorknob.
IMO, Smith really got it right with the L frame.
If they wanted something to compete with the Python-sized Colt .357s they succeeded.
For me, the advantages of a Smith over a Colt are that the Smiths are easy to work on and have worked on (and done right), and to get parts for.
Any other advantages they may have are just a bonus.
Just like the Ruger GP100, I hated the L frames when I was growing up.
Then, I shot them. And bought them.
Long live the L frame.