hkcavalier
US Veteran
$1200 is too high.
I bought mine for $700 and probably would have passed at $800+.
I bought mine for $700 and probably would have passed at $800+.
The above poster is right on! I can tell you that the 5" is the best balanced one of the bunch and is every bit as accurate as the longer barreled ones. Unless the price is hateful, you cannot go wrong with that gun. I use mine for target shooting at 25 yards as well as deer hunting - many holster makers offer ones for that barrel length in that frame. I have a 240-grain cast semi-wadcutter recipe that shoots to the same point of impact at 25 yards as the Hornady 240-grain XTP factory load I use for hunting (can't see bothering with loading handgun hunting shells when you shoot so few of them per year).
Buy the gun already! Don't make one of us do it! Ed
Lots of discussion about if the price isn't too high, it's worth buying. Well, what is too high for this gun? I'm thinking I'd go $1200--what do the experts think?
Nothing like a little push (shove) from the Forum.![]()
It's not unusual to have the hammer block make some noise as it moves freely in its cutout. That is a good thing as it is free and not binding.
S&W started using the hammer block just prior to the end of WWII.
The hammer block is a small bar that rides in a slot cut inside the sideplate which prevents accidental discharge if a loaded revolver was accidently dropped onto its hammer spur.
Let us know how it shoots.
Go for it and sell it to one of us if you decide you don't want it!