Is a 3913 a good gun?

Register to hide this ad
The local Sheriff's Office went to S&W 9mm automatics way back in the day. Kept them less than a year. They kept blowing out extractors. I would assume that better-different-improved parts are now available if you actually want to shoot it.
 
The local Sheriff's Office went to S&W 9mm automatics way back in the day. Kept them less than a year. They kept blowing out extractors. I would assume that better-different-improved parts are now available if you actually want to shoot it.

What? "back in the day..." early 39s from the 60s maybe.

2nd and 3rd Gen guns ..... never heard of this issue!!!!!!

3913 is 3rd Gen from the 1990s.... been carrying one since they were introduced in 1989/90.
 
That is a reasonable price

The S&W 3913 is a fine gun, but I prefer the S&W 3953 because it is slimmer. Parts, such as sights and magazines, have gotten pricey and holsters aren’t readily available though many makers offer them. There were two dust cover styles as well. MIM and black steel hammers and triggers were used.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_3035.jpg
    IMG_3035.jpg
    55.7 KB · Views: 99
  • IMG_3037.jpg
    IMG_3037.jpg
    62.7 KB · Views: 98
Depending on condition, $400 is a good price point today.

You might want to watch a couple of YouTube videos on the Model 3913. Also, here a video on what to look for when inspecting to buy a used pistol... [ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocYaQm-o7lg[/ame].

The 3900 series pistols are great shooters and concealed carry option.

Don Hume has some fine holster options for these Gen3 pistols. They were selling to buyers when these pistols first hit the market. I like the H715-M WCS for IWB concealed carry.

Buy and enjoy.
 
As a state trooper, I carried one for 4 years as a daily carry in my uniform and out. They were excellent in every way and I have never seen or heard of one broken in any way. Mine was shot 60 rds per quarter in qualification as was every other one that was issued. I also used it in several shooting schools. After the 9mm was replaced by the state with 40's, I bought mine and carried it concealed off duty for many years. They are great pistols. $400 for a servicable one is a steal.
 
In general the 3913 was great for its time. It was a reliable compact 9mm semi auto, back when they weren't common. Supposedly the 3913 was based of some customiz model 39s like the ASP. Often found as an Police Officer's off duty pistol or as a concealed carry pistol. My Father (God rest his soul) used one as both his carry gun and house gun since the late 90s. He had a number of other pistols but found the 3913 the most reliable and concealable. I shot a number of times as well. While we mostly ran 115 grain FMJs through it, I cannot recall any malfunctions. Based on that, my brother selected a 3953 (IIRC) as his off duty weapon when he went on the job with NYPD. He reports no issues with his either. The 3953 had no issues and was fired with the SPEER 124+P+ GDHP used by NYPD at the time. I was so enamored by the 3913, that I wanted to purchase my own. Unfortunately, S&W had discontinued it (and those that had them wouldn't sell them) and I had to settle for it's competitor the SIG 239.
I've also owned another of the 3913s competitors, the Kahr K-9. While the K-9 is a decent pistol I still prefer the 3913.
The Novak designed sights on the pistol are very good. I found the controls were easy to manipulate. The pistol functioned reliably with out needing any work. The magazines were easily found at the time but have become rarer as the years went by. Our factory magazines were good quality and durable. I don't recommend the "generic" ones.

My only druthers with the pistol were the magazine safety (i don't care for them) and the Grips. The pistols plastic grip is ok, but not wonderful. Hogue used to make a decent aftermarket grip for them.

I would have no issue carrying a 3913 for self defense. However, the 3913 has been eclipsed by more modern designs like the S&W Shield (Smaller and Lighter) and the SIG 365 (higher capacity and probably smaller)

$400 for one is a decent price depending on the condition of the gun and how many magazines it come with.
 
Last edited:
It is in pretty good condition. I don’t know yet how many mags it has with it. I can get it for a test drive and see how I like it. It sure has a different personality than carrying a G19!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
That's what I paid for a new on in 1994, most 3rd gen guns have went up in price so I'd say its a good price.
I haven't touched mine in about a decade, I found I like striker guns better.
The TDA action of the 3913 I learned I just don't like. If you don't mind a heavy first pull then light afterwards grab it as they are great guns.
I just prefer the same trigger pull every time.
 
A local gun shop has a 3913 under the glass for $499+tax. It’s scuffed up a bit.

I had a 3913 for a short time 25 years ago. I paid $475, and sold it for $450. Mine was much nicer than the one currently at the LGS. The one I had would put 5 shots under 2.5 inches at 25 yards, never jammed.

Like most of the G3 Smiths, the 3913 is honestly, obsolete. That doesn’t mean they’re not really cool, and work as well as they ever did. Time has moved on. If I ever see a minty example for less than $600, I’ll probably buy it. Why? I have no rational explanation. They’re just cool.

Calligh on the original CSI carried a 3913.
 
Maybe out of fashion but definitely not obsolete. They still reliable, shoot easily available ammunition, are accurate, and you can still get some parts for them. There are companies still making holsters for them as well.


Why are they "obsolete"?

One of, if not the best single stack concealed carry 9mm ever built!

1911 still going strong 113 years later!
Walther PPK 90 years old
S&W model 19 just shy of 70

What makes it obsolete? Newer means newer... not better..... just different
 

Latest posts

Back
Top