Is "Not-Buyer's Remorse" a Thing?

Nothing New...I'm still kicking myself for not buying a nearly new three screw Ruger Blackhawk 41 magnum for $75.00...It was late 1971 and I thought I wanted a 44 magnum (some Dirty Harry movie had just come out) ! $75.00 ...What was I thinking !!!!!
Gary
 
Been There, Done That

Yes, I've experienced "not-buyers'" remorse as you phrase it. Also, buyers' remorse, sellers' remorse, gun "improvement" remorse, (leave well-enough alone), dummy remorse (when I didn't recognize the gem I was holding in my hands at a giveaway price.
Probably a few others also such as imbecile remorse when I lost my footing with a slung Browning BAR, fell and rolled over the rifle in rocky terrain.
 
Should have gone Full Auto in the 70's but didn't figure there was any real need to get in any hurry . It was still cheap to do and there were plenty of original guns ( not converted ) at prices I could have paid . ..... Then the 80's hit and it all went to pot . Last time I looked and it's been more than a few years an M16 was about $12000.00 and Thompsons were $7000.00 and up . Could have bought one new (M16 ) from Colt in the 70's - early 80's for $600.00 - $800.00 . S&W's were cheap and very neat as were the Swede K's .

Eddie
 
Last edited:
After last Christmas there were half a dozen guns on this forum that I would have bought but I was tapped out from the holidays! I think the shooter grade Triple Lock for $600 was the real kicker.

I'm gonna try to have money left over next year so I can scoop some of those New Year's deals up.
 
I have no regrets with guns I have passed up. If they hold my attention from the start I buy them as long as they are within my budget.
I have seen lots of guns I could not afford that I would love to own, but never regretted that I could not afford one.
The rarified air that some Smiths exist in make them a pleasure to view, but these are for better heeled buyers than I to purchase.
 
Back in the '60s when I was just beginning to put together a U.S. military rifle collection, I came upon a really rare bird - it was a Model 1865 trapdoor Springfield (first Allin conversion), in caliber .58 rimfire. The asking price was $150, which sounds like peanuts now, but at the time was more than I thought I could afford. I passed it up. Today, that historical and almost-never-seen rifle could fetch multiple thousands.

"Lost opportunity remorse" would be my label for this problem!

John
 
I have much deeper regrets over guns I didn't buy then I ever will over the guns I bought (wrong).

Any gun a fellow buys a bit wrong is just paying for an education. The guns I missed, or chose not to buy though... those are haunting.

It's not even the ones that I couldn't afford, those I can dismiss. There are a lot of guns that have gone for more then I could swing (chiefly this set: IMPORTANT SMITH & WESSON HAND EJECTOR FIRST MODEL (TRIPLE LOCK) TARGET DA REVOLVERS WITH RARE BERNS-MARTIN DOUBLE HOLSTER RIG THAT BELONGED TO ELMER KEITH. which at least went to a wonderful guy). I can look at such guns and think to myself; if I were a rich man (didle didle dee). Then its ok. I can sleep at night.

There are some guns that I *could* have bought, but didn't. The first one that haunts me is kind of dumb, it was a perfect condition SVT-40 for around $400 when they were going for $950+, and now they are a thousand more then that. That one doesn't really hurt...much.

The one that stings is the one that I should have bought, but didn't because I was being "good" and saving for a house. The part that hurts is that I ended up saving up a lot more then I actually need to buy the house, so I totally could have afforded the .45-70 Double Rifle made by some no name company.. Colt it said. For $1500.

At the time I had no notion of how rare it was, just that I wanted a double rifle. It stung...a lot...when I found out how rare and valuable they were later.
 
Back
Top