Is s&w replacing parts or just modifing existing parts for their known issues mp15-22?
Fix will depend on the problem.
In my case, S&W had to replace the extractor, as it was no longer in the bolt. Did they replace it with same or improved part? I don't know, as I don't have the old one for comparison.
I think they also checked the location of the ejector.
They added two magazined to my collection.![]()
Is s&w replacing parts or just modifing existing parts for their known issues mp15-22?
As a matter of fact I did strip and clean the rifle prior to shooting it. I am downright O.C.D when it comes to cleaning my firearms.
There are numerous reports of extractors "blowing out" of the bolts on these weapons, and most of the instances I have read about were harmless, meaning nobody got hurt. In MYparticular case, this could have seriously hurt or (worse) me or someone else. I'm not a pansy by any stretch, but members of my family were shooting this rifle as well and it could have been bad.
I don't believe I'll try legal recourse or any of that crap because frankly.......that's what's wrong with this country today. However, when I ask if they will make it right, I mean are they going to "fix" the rifle and pretend nothing happened or will they maybe go above and beyond and take steps to retain future business from myself and others that have had similar incidents like this? I'll see what happens.
So who is to blame, the gun or the ammo?
We're ßeta testing this carbine. Get paid two magazines every time we sent 'em back for problem resolution.25% of users who responded to the poll indicate problems.
-- Chuck
I don't believe I'll try legal recourse or any of that crap because frankly.......that's what's wrong with this country today. However, when I ask if they will make it right, I mean are they going to "fix" the rifle and pretend nothing happened or will they maybe go above and beyond and take steps to retain future business from myself and others that have had similar incidents like this? I'll see what happens.