I'll be getting a .40 myself.
It's official the M2.0 is here!!
- Thread starter Bravo700
- Start date
I'll be getting a .40 myself.
The video says they do.
I have two 9s and a 45 that I am very happy with; can't see getting rid of any of them ; I may be adding a 40 also
As soon as the FBI chose 9mm, a lot of shooters that don't like the recoil of .40 had the excuse they needed to switch.
I have wanted a long slide .40, and this is probably it.
zymurgeist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 65
Granite Stater
Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2012
- Messages
- 94
- Reaction score
- 29
The 2.0 should be ok, is it because it's not listed on the infamous AG list?
Seems like your gripe should be with your politicians, not S&W.
martybee
Member
In some of the pictures I've seen, both in online reviews and market place; It looks like the 5" barrel version (In the FDE) has a loaded chamber indicator, "Shark Fin" similar to the CA compliant M&P's. Is this on all the 5''barrels?
Bought the 5" FDE from Sportsman Outdoor.....$459, no tax, free shipping, no cc fee and a $15 ffl fee. Hopefully it gets here next week. Fondled it at Academy and absolutely love the grip on this new model.
Need to find a good Kydex owb holster for it.
Need to find a good Kydex owb holster for it.
On S&Ws site you can click on state compliant models. They aren't there. I called and asked about the Shield 45 a bit ago and she said it's because of the trigger. At that time they had no intentions of making a MA specific one.
Yes, they suck too. BUT being that there are S&W models available in MA, and they are made in MA, and they come out with new models, I feel they should do a few runs of MA compliant versions. If they are doing a run of a few thousand, how hard would it be to do 5-10% of them with a MA compliant trigger?
zymurgeist
Member
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2016
- Messages
- 105
- Reaction score
- 65
They need to get approval from the totalitarian states before they can sell them there and we know how slowly the oppressive regimes are to adopt changes.
MA Compliant
S&W has to fill their distribution pipeline with their most popular, in demand models. This is a financial decision.
The next level will be the next top sellers--probably Pro models, perhaps a CORE, models with lasers, etc.
In the whole scheme of things, the amount of profit available from MA compliant sales is very small compared to other models that sell better. I bet it will happen, probably months from now.
I can pretty well guarantee S&W feels no obligation to produce low volume models for the restrictive political shenanigans that go on in the various states, including (especially) their home manufacturing state. Nothing personal. It's just business.
S&W has to fill their distribution pipeline with their most popular, in demand models. This is a financial decision.
The next level will be the next top sellers--probably Pro models, perhaps a CORE, models with lasers, etc.
In the whole scheme of things, the amount of profit available from MA compliant sales is very small compared to other models that sell better. I bet it will happen, probably months from now.
I can pretty well guarantee S&W feels no obligation to produce low volume models for the restrictive political shenanigans that go on in the various states, including (especially) their home manufacturing state. Nothing personal. It's just business.
Agree. Love the grip. Don't have to buy a talon grip for this one.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes. I was debating between a Glock 19, Glock 17, and M2.0 and ultimately went with another M&P because I already have mags. Less up front cost, plus not having to spend $$$ on extra mags sold me. Maybe the Glock 19 next month, who knows?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
