John kennedy assassination question

Some people just can't stand the idea that such a huge, pivotal event could be precipitated by a lone nut case. Frankly, one man, acting completely alone, seems the most likely route for success in an assassination attempt. Without anyone else having knowledge (no conspiracy) there is much less likelihood of the plot becoming known beforehand.

This x1000. Also see 1 October 2017 in Las Vegas.
 
Wake Up, and face facts Folks!

I hope this post is not considered political.
If any of the folks that are speculating on the assignation of JFK, are truly interested in the why's, and What for's, and solutions, I would suggest reading the book "Best Quotations Of Thomas Jefferson", before it is banned. The author of this book of quotes, foresaw the problems that we face today, and suggested solutions for them, centuries ago.
Chubbo
 
Many theories out there. Without even considering the motive, people involved, or the secretive and sloppy job of the Warren Commission, who was made up of politicians instead of Law Enforcement people, you have to ask yourself why the government would say they wrapped it all up in a neat package in secrecy and then locked it away from prying eyes for 75 years? Never did smell right to me.
 
I can't answer any of the questions that have been put forward here but, my own theory is that the MOB ordered it regardless of who carried it out. Also the same applied to Bobby Kennedy.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Strange, just strange.
An American who defects to the USSR and re-defects back to the USA just happens to get a job upstairs in a building in the only location where the Presidential convoy is required to slow down driving through Dallas?
This guy is Pro-Communist or Anti-Communist?
He goes to the Russian Embassy (esponiage operations headquarters) in Mexico City for what reason?

The CIA was aware that Oswald had visited the Russian Embassy in Mexico City. The FBI counter espionage office in DC was made aware of the visit. Apparently the FBI was just beginning to investigate Oswald when the assassination happened. My late uncle was a career FBI agent retiring in 1971 after a 30 year career. He was a counter intelligence expert on Russia. Shortly before his death a number of years ago I personally asked him if Oswald acted alone. He had worked on the case. He told me yes and that Oswald was indeed a but job. Good enough for me.
 
In any case Officer J.D. Tippit's family was the real losers, second were the American people. The idea that any Government collected data is unsafe for people to know for 50 years has changed our trust and faith in any of our leaders.
 
EXACTLY! People can't keep their mouths shut. With the internet NOTHING can be kept secret for long these days.[/QUOTE]

This only applies if two or more people know about it!

However I am surprised that the Warren commission didn't try to pin the Lindbergh baby disappearance on somebody.

Ivan
 
The public will never know what really happened that day. JFK was killed because he had set out to expose the shadow government. JFK ordered an investigation called Iron Mountain. LBJ after he became president said the report was never to be revealed to the public. The report has had been leaked out and can be found now on the internet.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTT6SVraCP8[/ame]

We can do one of two things. Believe what they lead us to believe through mass media or we can open our minds to research for truth about what is going on around us.
It is easier to fool someone than it is to convince someone they have been fooled. Albert Einstein.
 
Anybody who knows a MODICUM of science can disprove the 'evidence' that the the moon landings were staged.

The government is not using every hgh flying plane to spray chemicals. They are CONTRAILS and have been there since planes have been able to fly high enough.

If they found a body double for Paul McCartney they sure found a dang talented one.

Crop circles are made by people with careful guidance stomping around in fields.

Just stating that I'm not a 'conspiracy theorist', but there are way too many holes, motives, conflicting evidence, etc., etc in the JFK thing. The only thing I'm sure of is that Oswald took some shots at JFK from the book depository. Whether that's all there is to it or the mafia, Castro, Soviets, political enemies and about everybody else had something to do with it, is all in the realm of possibility.

Please! EVERYONE knows that Paul had a stand-in!

Seriously though, I don't buy into all these. However, If I ask questions, I'm labeled a "conspiracy theorist".

For instance, concerning the moon landing. I know we went. But the first clip has an astronaut telling us that we can't go back because we "destroyed the technology".

The second clip has a Nasa engineer telling us of the hazards of the Van Allen radiation belt.

My questions are 1. Why would we destroy the technology? Can any scientist here explain this to me? Did we destroy the technology to fly across the Atlantic after Charles Lindberg proved it was possible? No, so why would we in this instance?

2. If the Van Allen radiation belt wasn't a problem 50 years ago, why would it be now?

And just by asking these simple questions, I am now a "conspiracy theorist"!

And I'm sorry for the thread drift!


[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BK-uatwOOeA[/ame]

[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw&t=46s[/ame]
 
WHAT---happened to all that info on the assassination that was ""declassified"" and ""supposed"" to be released to the public a number of months ago?? At least one inquiring mind wants to know?
 
The public will never know what really happened that day. JFK was killed because he had set out to expose the shadow government. JFK ordered an investigation called Iron Mountain. LBJ after he became president said the report was never to be revealed to the public.
But I thought Castro was behind it. Or was it the CIA? Or the Mafia because RFK was going after them? Or Jimmy Hoffa? Every conspiracy theorist always blames the people who they already particularly don't like. If someone hates dogs they'll find a reason to blame the SPCA for it.
A loser communist twerp with a $14 rifle killed our President. Blaming others for his crimes, or calling him a patsy is letting him off the hook to a certain degree.
 
Would the government rather people think......

....that it was one nut guy who was killed right away and won't bother anybody else or that is was a group of people conspiring to kill for some reason(s) and not know who they were? If I were 'the government' I'd prefer the former whether or not I told the hole truth about it.

Jack Ruby was probably both coerced and rewarded. "If you do this job we'll take care of your family. If you don't we'll 'bother' your family"
 
It really doesn't matter.

What has been done has been done.
Most of the people involved in this have moved on from this life. Do I believe there was a conspiracy? Yes, I do. I have my own personal take on it, but will not vent them on this or any other forum.

Even if the entire truth were to be revealed in this or several other cases like it through our history, so much BS has been put out over the decades that the truth would be ignored or debunked as just another conspiracy theory.

Justice will always be served. If not here, then elsewhere.

In this case, I believe it has.
 
WHAT---happened to all that info on the assassination that was ""declassified"" and ""supposed"" to be released to the public a number of months ago?? At least one inquiring mind wants to know?

I believe it's all out there for you to look at if you go to the National Archives and bother to leaf through it.

But apparently there was simply nothing in there that even justified a blog entry, let alone any "revelations".

Which brings us back to "Told you so." :)
 
I think that the book "Mortal Error" presents a very plausible theory.
The agent with the rifle sued the author and got a settlement of some sort. But if Connelly and everyone else heard shots from way up in the School Book building, how come not a single other Secret Service, police, or anyone else in the cars hear a loud shot in the very car they were in or near it? Someone would have said something at first before they all got together and decided to hush it up. But it makes more sense than the guy with an umbrella gun or a sniper shooting from the sewer drain like some say, though I think Oswald did it alone.
 
It could of been the same group of people who were involved in the assassination of Gen. Patton; for similar reasons.
 
That was my birthday, being a kid, I was more upset at my birthday party going down the tubes than the assassination. Put me down pretty much with the Warren Commission. I sat in the sniper's nest in the book depository building before it was roped off and it was not an exceptionally difficult shot - even more so for a qualified Marine sharpshooter. Oswald did it. Of course, JFK is still alive on a Greek island with Elvis and Adolph Hitler.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top