John kennedy assassination question

There is one element that very few folks mention.

A Dallas PD motor officer's radio microphone got stuck "open" at the instant the shots were fired and hindered communications as well as recorded the shots being fired. The officer had called in a traffic stop on a black Chevrolet with no license plate. I've listened to the recordings of that radio traffic many times over the years until I finally realized what was wrong. It is what isn't there. He never clears the stop and goes back in service. If your mike was keyed, you couldn't hear everyone else. So, there would be no reason not to go back into service when you finished. Also, there is no way a minor violation would have merited tying up the radio as the motorcade is in the area. Any supervisor would have your head for that.A car with no plates would be untraceable unless he wrote a ticket.

Yes, radio mikes occasionally got stuck back then. But, at that exact moment?? Hmmmmm........
 
Last edited:
It could of been the same group of people who were involved in the assassination of Gen. Patton; for similar reasons.

Awesome! I thought you were trying to be sarcastic, but this theory seems to be a thing. From a summary in "The Telegraph" of a book by Robert Wilcox, claiming to be a military historian:

"His book, "Target Patton", contains interviews with Mr Bazata, who died in 1999, and extracts from his diaries, detailing how he staged the car crash by getting a troop truck to plough into Patton's Cadillac and then shot the general with a low-velocity projectile, which broke his neck while his fellow passengers escaped without a scratch.

Mr Bazata also suggested that when Patton began to recover from his injuries, US officials turned a blind eye as agents of the NKVD, the forerunner of the KGB, poisoned the general."

I guess anyone taking that seriously wouldn't have a problem with a rifle-toting sasquatch on the grassy knoll either.
 
A loser communist twerp with a $14 rifle killed our President. Blaming others for his crimes, or calling him a patsy is letting him off the hook to a certain degree.
He didn't get much time to enjoy being off the hook ...
ap-century-collection.jpg
 
Oswald never fired a shot, a patsy. Ruby was Mafia.

Two shooters near the Depository were Mafia.

Head shot came from a .222 (.223) REM Fireball, at the grassy knoll by James Files, a Mafia hit man.

We will never know the real truth, conspiracy was deep.

Just like 911, there were people who knew about it in advance. Conspiracy?
 
Too long as far as I'm concerned! I know you must have seen this one.

i_76de36abfc8616c0848afcde7a371b4e_oswaldruby.jpg

Beat me to it.

As far as I'm concerned, this photo proves that Oswald wasn't actually killed. They faked his death and spirited him off into the witness protection program. And then photoshopped a picture of an earlier performance of the Lee Oswald Band. The guy in the TV footage of Ruby's shot doesn't really look like Oswald.
 
Ruby owned a strip club that was popular with cops. He let them in without charging cover and probably gave them free beer/booze.

So because of that, he was known to the Dallas cops and was allowed past the security line without a search.

And because of that, history is made.
 
Last edited:
It's just hard to wrap your mind around that a loser with a $20 rifle killed the President.

I have no problem with the concept. Again, see 1 Oct 2017 in Las Vegas. Just more money and firepower involved.

Loser Gavrilo Princip got his chance because somebody took a wrong turn, and how many lives did that cost? Chance is something you cannot legislate for or control, but that does not fit the average American's requirement for control. Therefore, there had to be a conspiracy. Funny that the Archduke's chauffeur was never named as a conspirator.
 
Second Secret Service Car behind Kennedy limo, Agent holding newly acquired M16,,,,,This is the smoking gun as per Mortal Error.

jfk-hickey.jpg


The original book and reinvestigation of books facts make this theory most believable.
I think nothing ever became of that lawsuit because agent involved would have had to testify. The agent never responded to the the authors request to confirm or deny. Many attempts were made with no response. I think if I was being questioned of my involvement in this I would have responded.
That book is very good.

As Sherlock Holmes once said,,,,. Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. ;)

giphy.gif
 
I get tired of hearing it.....

...For instance, concerning the moon landing. I know we went. But the first clip has an astronaut telling us that we can't go back because we "destroyed the technology"....

"They destroyed all of the drawings and tooling. We can't do now what we did 50 years ago. the technical ability of our workforce is not around any more. We couldn't build an Saturn 5/Apollo combination or hybrid now."

I think what we really lack now is technical ability, motivation, leadership and guts.
 
Last edited:
.....
As Sherlock Holmes once said,,,,. Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth. ;)
....

Indeed. The problem here just seems to be that for over 50 years now, folks have tried to eliminate the perfectly possible in favor of complicated constructions, all of which require many more contrivances and logical contortions than the simple truth :)
 
What has always puzzled me is the that shot that killed Kennedy took off some of the back of his head. Would that be consistent with the entrance wound from a fmj, or the result of a frontal hit with an expanding bullet?

I've always suspected the latter.
 
While I'm always on the hunt for reading material, 25% of the people who reviewed this book on Amazon gave it a one star rating and only 53% rated it 5 stars. That's not a good rating by anyone's measure, so I'll pass.



Proof of how ingrained the conspiracy theories have become. Pushing them has become an industry.

A lot of people refuse to believe otherwise, no matter what evidence to the contrary they're presented with.
 
"They destroyed all of the drawings and tooling. We can't do now what we did 50 years ago. the technical ability of our workforce is not around any more. We couldn't build an Saturn 5/Apollo combination or hybrid now."

I think what we really lack now is technical ability, motivation, leadership and guts.

If we can put an electric car in space we can put a man on the moon again!



As long as the aliens let us. ;)
 
None of this is truly ridiculous; just look at the things that have been done in the past, both foreign and domestic, that the general public has been made aware of. Then think of what may have been done that few will ever know about.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top