Originally posted by Andy Griffith:
Originally posted by jjones33:
Originally posted by handejector:
Originally posted by Gary:
A big part of the problem is that a lot of people want a letter for every S&W that they buy and are willing to pay for them. This means that a lot of time is spent sending letters letting people know which distributor their 625 was sent to in 2003. This delays processing the letter requests for the older guns which may have historical significance. Perhaps the price increase will help.
Better get your steel pot and flak vest out- you're gonna draw fire with that one.....
I don't letter even older guns when I know that it will come back as shipped to Springfield Armory or shipped to this and that distributer. If I have no feeling that it wasn't sent as a PD gun, a Victory, etc. why waste my money and his time. I'm afraid I agree with Gary. Who gives a rat's tail that someones model 29 was shipped to Lew Horton. I've paid for my share of letters and none has not proven to be pedestrian as I pick and choose which guns to have checked.
I have to agree with the above posters.
However, if a person has a reason to letter a recent manufacture firearm- by all means do it.
For instance, if a gun was sent directly from the factory to a dealer with a special "C/O" or "Attention to:" that will show up on the letter as being shipped to a certain famous/historical person...such as a country singer, statesman, etc., I think the letter is well worth it.
That is, of course, if you have the $50.00 to send in for the letter.
Let's see...for the price of ten letters, you could get a very nice pre-war something.
For the price of 20 letters, you could have a nearly a down payment on a Registered Magnum.