ggibson511960
Member
No Comment to OP
My comment was not to the OP, nor about primer seating, nor to the speculation about light strikes or FTF. It was about the "heavy trigger" of another poster and the reasons for a "heavy trigger".
The only way I've ever been able to achieve a light strike or FTF in a S&W revolver is to back off the strain screw in a misdirected hope of achieving a light DA pull. There isn't much to go wrong in the fall of a hammer. Hammer could be rubbing side plates, or a broken firing pin, or gross excessived headspace, or a truly dirty handgun. Reloads are the overwhelmingly higher probability. You are correct that the primer anvil must contact the primer pocket bottom for reliable ignition. Otherwise the pin strike dissipates energy pushing the cup into the pocket rather than crushing the pellet against the anvil.
Read it again, 1 of 100, fired the 2nd time, not the gun.
The priming system on the lnl, like the 550, is not ideal. Primers need to seat in the bottom of the pocket, not flush with the case head, push harder! It is almost impossible to have a primer go off seating it properly. Mine all look a little flat, yes I push that hard. I never get a ftf on a primer, even cci n a glock.
My comment was not to the OP, nor about primer seating, nor to the speculation about light strikes or FTF. It was about the "heavy trigger" of another poster and the reasons for a "heavy trigger".
The only way I've ever been able to achieve a light strike or FTF in a S&W revolver is to back off the strain screw in a misdirected hope of achieving a light DA pull. There isn't much to go wrong in the fall of a hammer. Hammer could be rubbing side plates, or a broken firing pin, or gross excessived headspace, or a truly dirty handgun. Reloads are the overwhelmingly higher probability. You are correct that the primer anvil must contact the primer pocket bottom for reliable ignition. Otherwise the pin strike dissipates energy pushing the cup into the pocket rather than crushing the pellet against the anvil.