Lockless Conceal Carry Options?

gr7070

Member
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
1,047
Reaction score
234
I'm not one who normally has an issue with the lock. Sure, given the choice I'll go without it. Since there are conceal carry options without it and I think that's the one time it matters some, I'd like to consider all my no-lock options.

So, what are my no-lock carry options? I'm looking to pocket carry.

I know the 642 can come no-lock.

Not sure about the 442. It doesn't appear the 4/638 has the no lock option.

What else?

Much thanks in advance!
 
Register to hide this ad
Any S&W revolver made before 2001 will be lockless. In J frames this would include, but not limited to:
M36, M37, M38, M40, M42, M49, M60, M640, M642, M442, .....The list goes on and on.
 
642 no lock or 442 no lock would be at the top of my list. You can also get Pro series versions of either model, which are cut for moon clips and have no locks.
 
While I realize this is a S&W site you may want to consider the Colt Cobra .38. Available on the used market these are 6 shot D frame Colts about the same size and weight as the Js mentioned above.

I own and carry a couple of the Js, but my favorite is my 1968 Cobra w/a bobbed hammer. Just something to think about . . .
 
Thanks for all the replies. I probably should have mentioned that I was mostly interested in new. I wouldn't have a problem with used, but I would prefer to just be able to buy one readily available.

47D thanks for the great post.

I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.
 
I went with a clean used 640-1. Very nice little revolver.

I'm also a big fan of the Colt Cobra. Good luck with your search! Regards 18DAI.
 
< snip > I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.

I've had a model 49 for years, and although I don't carry it much, I've never had a lint problem with it. There are no paths into the innards of the gun when the hammer is down (as it will be when it's carried) and any lint that might collect behind the hammer spur (between the "ears" of the frame) is easily visible. Now if you carry it for a decade and never clean out the hammer path you might well have a lint problem, but a quick blow on any dust you may see behind the hammer from time to time will keep things clean enough for reliable operation.

Personally I see and feel no difference in double action shooting between my 49 and my "hammerless" 442 (except for the extra weight of the all steel 49.) But it is fun to be able to cock the hammer and fire carefully aimed single action shots at longer distances. I was at the range today, introducing a friend's wife to the joys of shooting. At one point I moved back 25 yards from a rack of 6" plates and let fly with the snubbies. I could hit pretty well with the 442, but got more hits easier with the 49 when I cocked it.
 
Thanks for all the replies. I probably should have mentioned that I was mostly interested in new. I wouldn't have a problem with used, but I would prefer to just be able to buy one readily available.

47D thanks for the great post.

I do like the idea of the 638, being able to see where the hammer for some reason is comforting. I do wonder if that's really worth much, and whether it's at all worth the risk of lint becoming a problem after a decade of use.
forget about the lock its a non issue, the new guns lock or no lock are excellent do to CNC machining and Superior metallurgy
 
Last edited:
For me it's not an issue with the lock. After reading this same discussion all over this forum, I went with a 36 in good, but not great, condition that I picked up for under $300. I wanted something in steel vs. alloy. The 36 I picked up cost less than half that of a new one and many on the forum would argue that it's a better gun - it certainly locks up tighter than any of the 'other' brands I handled.

So, IMHO, it's about price and quality, not the lock.

I just put the Pachmayr Compacs on it for carry yesterday - I don't want to tear up the original diamond, serialized, wood grips that came on it. They had to order a DeSantis pocket holster for me. So I'll be good to go in a few days.
 
My Carry Guns

These are the guns I carry. M638 w/ a Barami Hip Grip and my M649 in an Galco Ankle Glove. I removed the lock in my M638 and trplaced it with "The Plug".
 

Attachments

  • bodyguards.jpg
    bodyguards.jpg
    178.7 KB · Views: 35
If looking at new no lock pistols, the big consideration is price. The 442 and 642 are fairly cost efficient, while the others listed are priced significantly higher.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top