You might be right however it will depend how any new magazine limiting federal laws might be written (FWIW I don't think such a law would stand a chance of passage with our current Congress - who knows in the future).
I hope you're right and no such law does pass. But, you know stranger things have happened.
The NJ law I live with doesn't make modification illegal, only that they not be "temporary modifications".
That sort of illustrates my concern. Where I live there are no limitations on magazines. I could glue one 25 round magazine to the bottom of another 25 magazine and no one would look twice -- perhaps only to ask were can I buy one of those.
My concern is that each state, for that matter each country, has different laws. Applying a one size fits all, without also including the caveat that this may be illegal where you live or may become illegal in the future, I think is not doing anyone any good. Sometimes what you want and what you can have, are not always on the same page.
This probably means that you'd have to at least epoxy the heel of the magazine that had a restrictor modification from being evaluated as "temporary". Here's the law we live with in NJ.
[read posted law and snipped for brevity]
Which raises the question, how many people in NJ who have read threads in this forum about the modification and have perform the modification, even considered that 25 does not equal 15. That is to say, once they removed the pin, did they re-restrict the magazine to 15 rounds and epoxy the floorplate?
Most likely they modified the magazine and never gave it another thought. Either they were unaware of the law or they simply ignored the law, yet they already have an illegal magazine without any future legislation.
Its worth noting that all the 25rd/32rd mags that are "pinned" to accept only 10 rds are shipped to NJ by everyone and sold by every gunshop in NJ so therefore I can only assume they are considered permanent modifications.
Not only permanent, un-modified.
