Pasifikawv
Member
I've been in the market for a slim, single-stack bottom feeder in 9mm. Topping my list was the M&P Shield and the Bersa BP9cc based upon research -plus some loyalty to both makers. Swung by my LGS today having cashed my check from Job#2. Side-by-side in the cabinet was one of each.
These two pistols are very similar in size, weight, and function. Also, overall quality in terms of fit and finish seemed comparable. The M&P Shield had a list price of $439. The Bersa BP9cc $449. With haggling, they were identical in price despite the $10 difference in list price.
***Blaspheme alert***
After handling both I decided on the Bersa. I found the Bersa simply felt better in my hand, seemed to ride a little lower when gripped, had a better grip angle (for me, a natural pointer) and the trigger was significantly better. The Shield trigger was heavier, grittier, and with a longer travel. The Bersa trigger was lighter and much more crisp - a very nice an out-of-the box trigger. The trigger and grip angle were the deciding factors for me.
The biggest plus for the M&P Shield was that it did not have the annoying mag-disconnect safety that is standard on the Bersa (for import point?). Also, many others would certainly prefer the S&W Shield grip angle as that is a personal preference and not an indication of quality or function.
Both seemed to be great little bottom-feeders, but in the end, I went with the Bersa. That said, I can easily see why many really like the M&P Shield. Setting aside personal preferences in hand fit/feel and grip angle, and just looking at the fit & function: the two issues were trigger (Bersa wins) and annoying mag-catch safety (Shield wins).
Unfortunately, my shopping and side-by-side did not include any range time. That, too, could make all the difference.
These two pistols are very similar in size, weight, and function. Also, overall quality in terms of fit and finish seemed comparable. The M&P Shield had a list price of $439. The Bersa BP9cc $449. With haggling, they were identical in price despite the $10 difference in list price.
***Blaspheme alert***
After handling both I decided on the Bersa. I found the Bersa simply felt better in my hand, seemed to ride a little lower when gripped, had a better grip angle (for me, a natural pointer) and the trigger was significantly better. The Shield trigger was heavier, grittier, and with a longer travel. The Bersa trigger was lighter and much more crisp - a very nice an out-of-the box trigger. The trigger and grip angle were the deciding factors for me.
The biggest plus for the M&P Shield was that it did not have the annoying mag-disconnect safety that is standard on the Bersa (for import point?). Also, many others would certainly prefer the S&W Shield grip angle as that is a personal preference and not an indication of quality or function.
Both seemed to be great little bottom-feeders, but in the end, I went with the Bersa. That said, I can easily see why many really like the M&P Shield. Setting aside personal preferences in hand fit/feel and grip angle, and just looking at the fit & function: the two issues were trigger (Bersa wins) and annoying mag-catch safety (Shield wins).
Unfortunately, my shopping and side-by-side did not include any range time. That, too, could make all the difference.
Last edited: