M64 vs. M67? (Fixed vs Adjustable Sights)

[JayFramer]

All I am sorry if this has been done before, but I figure we can get a current pulse on this topic, which is:

Which do you prefer? The fixed sights on the Model 64 or the adjustable sights on the Model 67? Of course this also applies to any other K-frame line too. I am just asking about the 64/67 as I plan to buy one of them soon but am weighing the pros and cons of each.

So which do you prefer and why?

 

[Blueinterceptor]

I was trained on a fixed sight k frame. Model 10/13. I am very comfortable with that platform. When I use a model 19 or 586 I do not enjoy the same confidence level or accuracy. I am always concerned that the sights might be "off". Fixed sights are virtually indestructible and adjustable sights are not. The rear sight can move or be crushed. I'm never quite sure of my sight picture, as opposed to the fixed variety.
That's my opinion.

 

[rockquarry]

An adjustable rear sight is certainly susceptible to damage where a fixed notch rear sight is not, but this is really a very small concern from a practical standpoint. I've never had an adjustable rear sight "move". I prefer the adjustable sight.

While the fixed sight .38s will usually shoot to point of aim or close to it with 158 grain bullets, they will generally shoot low, sometimes 6" to 8" low with light bullets in the 110 -125 grain range. Also, more than a few fixed sight guns may have a minor windage problem, but often this may be only an inch or two.

As for the comparing sight picture between the two, I guess they are technically different, but the difference is slight enough that transitioning between the two presents no problem. Both work well in this regard.

 

[Breakaway500]

I like both. Equally.

 

[daddy bear]

Never had it happen to me, but our armorer frequently replaced broken adjustable rear sight blades. I'm pretty sure I still have a couple of spares, just in case.

Jack

 

[KalamazooKid]

I love my fixed sight Js and Ks - this M64 is a very recent purchase ......

I love the smooth simplicity!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[VaTom]

I love my fixed sight Js and Ks - this M64 is a very recent purchase ......

I love the smooth simplicity!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nice. Have a model 64 just like it that I purchased in 1976. Took it to the range two days ago. In my opinion the best conceal carry k frame. With a good pancake holster you hardly know it is there!

 

[jeeps]

Like fixed they do not snag or get stuck on garments.

 

[BAM-BAM]

As a rule of thumb fixed sights on guns 3"or less and adjustable on 4'' or more.........

That said I do own 2 1/2 and 3 inch 19s and 66s with adjustable sights and a
4" 681 w/ fixed sights.......

 

[KalamazooKid]

As a rule of thumb fixed sights on guns 3"or less and adjustable on 4' or more.........

This is how I roll.

 

[UncleEd]

I like both. Equally.

This which is why can't vote in the survey.

Can't speak for Breakaway but I feel slighted.

 

[loeman]

Generally, I prefer fixed sights. All of my home defense guns are fixed. I'm also very partial to the Model 64. Here are a couple of pics. The trigger on the 2 inch model is the best revolver trigger I own. It used to be my Md 681 (also fixed) but the new champ is my Md 64, 2 inch. Maybe someone did some trigger work on it in the past, I don't know, but if they did, I'm happy!

 

[KSDeputy]

None of my combat firearms have adjustable sights, and none ever will.

 

[DD357]

4" and up, adjustable. 2-3", I'm not picky.

 

[murphydog]

I think it depends on the intended use. Fixed sights have advantages for "social use" as noted above but (taller, more visible) adjustable sights are better for target work for me. The best of both worlds is probably high visibility fixed sights that can be drifted or heights changed as needed.

There, a non-answer to the poll .

 

[JayFramer]

I see the participants are "neck and neck" as it were, interesting!

 

[Joe4d]

didnt vote as you left out the best of both worlds option.
The semi fixed, Durability and simplicity of fixed, with a better sight picture than a receiver groove. With adequate adjustablity to correct point of impact issues.
Like the CS sight and the novak style on the 640 pro.

 

[JayFramer]

didnt vote as you left out the best of both worlds option.
The semi fixed, Durability and simplicity of fixed, with a better sight picture than a receiver groove. With adequate adjustablity to correct point of impact issues.
Like the CS sight and the novak style on the 640 pro.

Semi-fixed? First time I ever heard that term for sights... no matter, this is between the traditional S&W sights.

 

[31FordA]

I'm in the like them equally group. A quick count shows I own an equal number of fixed and adjustable K frames. I do prefer the fixed guns for carry and the adjustables for the range.

Put me down as a big fan of the 2" 64 also. I bought a 64-2 last year because I got a good deal on it, and was surprised by just how good it shoots. It was so good I qualified with it and carry it for work. Up against Glocks and M&P's my Model 64 had the only perfect score. Put a stop to the dinosaur comments for a bit.

 

[Beachcomber]

In response to your poll question...
(unfortunately there is not a third option)

I voted for the Model 64 with fixed sights as I carry it more often.

I prefer the fixed sights on my 2" Model 64-2 for concealed carry and I prefer the adjustable sights on my 4" Model 67 when target shooting and hunting.