M651 .22 mag..hammer block rod..

Pappy1911

Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2009
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi folks..new here, but not with S&Ws.
I have several of the older models including one with which I have a question;

M651 .22 mag bought new in 1984. Upon removal of the side plate, I have discovered that the hammer block rod (about 1 1/4" long) is missing.

Now, it does have the hammer rebound slide as a safety measure.

So, is the long rod really necessary or is it a Lawyer's idea of an additional safety?

Thank you.
 
Register to hide this ad
Pappy, welcome to the forum. The gun will function without the rod but I would get one and put it in. Don't want it to discharge if dropped. The rebound slide is not a safety device.
 
Pappy, welcome to the forum. The gun will function without the rod but I would get one and put it in. Don't want it to discharge if dropped. The rebound slide is not a safety device.

Thanks hsguy...I contacted S&W customer service and they want me to send the gun back to them for inspection!!!! For a $5 drop-in part. Shipping is a lot of $$$$$.

The best to you..
 
Last edited:
I'd try an aquire one threw Numbrich or Midway & install it yourself..
The Centennials don't have this piece as they can't be cocked for SA & the hammer does rest on the rebound slide
I've also seen were guns were converted for DAO & that part is removed..
You might be able to find one by asking in the Classifieds
Gary/Hk
 
Definitely call S&W and get one of those to install or send it to them and have them do it, whichever you're more comfortable with.
Since it's a safety issue S&W may even just send it to you but even if they want a small amount of $$ it's worth it.
That'll be $1000 please. :)
 
Definitely call S&W and get one of those to install or send it to them and have them do it, whichever you're more comfortable with.
Since it's a safety issue S&W may even just send it to you but even if they want a small amount of $$ it's worth it.
That'll be $1000 please. :)

Yes, I was trying to get them to send me one as a customer courtesy.
Still waiting for a reply.
 
Even if they want you to pay shipping both ways it would be much less expensive for you to pay them and see if they'll send the shipping tag.
 
Looking at their I.P.B., it seems I can just order one. $5.30 plus shipping.
 
The rebound slide is the primary safety device (not including common sense). The hammer block is the secondary safety device.
 
Last edited:
The rebound slide is the primary safety device (not including common sense). The hammer block is the secondary safety device.

That was my thinking rere.

I get the feeling that the hammer block was added at some period as a lawyer designed safety.
 
Don't forget my $1000 fee. :)

I sent it by carrier pigeon...you didn't get it yet????
confused.gif
 
Oops, was that your pigeon?
While I'm not 100% certain, I think the early guns like the first of the 1917 revolvers didn't have a hammer block but it came along while they were still in production. My 1905 4th change has one although it's an earlier design.
 
Oops, was that your pigeon?
While I'm not 100% certain, I think the early guns like the first of the 1917 revolvers didn't have a hammer block but it came along while they were still in production. My 1905 4th change has one although it's an earlier design.

Had to have a look at my 1917 (1937 Brazilian contract) and it has a different set-up. It's a springy thing set in the side plate that extends up to around the hammer face..I guess it's a block..hard to tell.
 
It would be easier to see if you'd put your octo, quad, tri, bi-focal glasses back on ( :D Y :D )

Did I mention it's good to see you here? :)
___________________
One forum, One pest
 
Thank you Joni....I did look up that model in an old 1939 Stoegers catalog and it's called a hammer block.

As regards to my visual of the innards, it's dark and dirty in there...I seriously need to give it a cleaning....
killer1.gif
 

Latest posts

Back
Top