Anything that kills a human will kill a deer. All of hunting is about shot placement, regardless of caliber.
It always makes me genuinely curious (and not in a jerk kinda way) of how many folks that recoil in horror about altering a Model 16-4 were also hardcore S&W revolver fans from 1988-1992 and also bought or dreamed of buying a 16-4.
I say this because I am certain that this model just did not sell. Of this I am certain, simply because of the piles of them that CDNN and other outfits had of these years later, new old stock, untouched in original box, for chump change.
There have been other models that did not sell and become total dream boats later, but this one just feels recent to me.
I wish I still had an old CDNN catalog. They were practically giving these away like door prizes. And today you see collectors trying to hawk them for two grand.
Not deer legal in Iowa. I would question if it's enough even for small deer.
Ha Ha Ha. Made me think of this.beating their gums
range monkeys
I kind of think the .327 had a lot to do with the seeming difficulty buying a 16-4 6" at a decent price. Another one bites the dust.
I kind of think the .327 had a lot to do with the seeming difficulty buying a 16-4 6" at a decent price. Another one bites the dust.
I suspect the diameter of the cylinder would prohibit chambering the K-frame in any caliber larger than 38/357. Even if it was a 5-shot K-frame, you still have to consider the yoke and it's size relationship with the barrel shank and then cylinder wall thickness.Why they didn’t do a 10mm in the K frame I will never know
Why they didn’t do a 10mm in the K frame I will never know