jesseatamez
Member
Hello All,
Yesterday when at a friend's house, I was shown a model of 1917 45 ACP revolver. Now, here is the thing, the cylinder had no shoulder in it for the cartridges, indicating that it had been reamed. Ok well the only logical thing to ream a 45 ACP cylinder for is 45LC right? Problem is, as we all know, the cylinder is too short to accomodate the long colt round. On the rear face of the cylinder it appears as though someone has added to the cylinder!!! Is this possible? I know the gun has zero collector value, but I must confess to still being interested if these mutilations haven't ruined it as a shooter. The gun is in the 170,000 serial range, and has no star stamp to indicate a factory rework. Besides, the factory would have just replaced the cylinder anyway right? Anyway, after finally catchiny my first 5 screw I frame, I now have 5 screw N frame lust, so I am just seeking an opinion.
Thanks Much, J. Tamez
Yesterday when at a friend's house, I was shown a model of 1917 45 ACP revolver. Now, here is the thing, the cylinder had no shoulder in it for the cartridges, indicating that it had been reamed. Ok well the only logical thing to ream a 45 ACP cylinder for is 45LC right? Problem is, as we all know, the cylinder is too short to accomodate the long colt round. On the rear face of the cylinder it appears as though someone has added to the cylinder!!! Is this possible? I know the gun has zero collector value, but I must confess to still being interested if these mutilations haven't ruined it as a shooter. The gun is in the 170,000 serial range, and has no star stamp to indicate a factory rework. Besides, the factory would have just replaced the cylinder anyway right? Anyway, after finally catchiny my first 5 screw I frame, I now have 5 screw N frame lust, so I am just seeking an opinion.
Thanks Much, J. Tamez