I keep thinking I ought to ask the guy on GB what he will give me for mine. I notice the diamond touches the ribbon on the right side and it doesn't on the left of mine:
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSR III
Another feature of the Roper stocks that I have looked at is the spacing between the left diamond and the ribbon. If you look at the first pair of Hammerdowns stocks, the ones on the Colt above, the ones in Ropers book and the pair for sale on the Colt on GB, they all seem to run together. That is, the diamond and the ribbon touch. Perhaps this observation is skewed by the ones that I have seen, however, I offer it for what it's worth. The pair on the GB gun also have the two square jig marks and the writting etched on the back.
Hello Patrick
That was exactly my Focal Point that I was trying to get across, as "there are Very Noticeable differences in some of Roper's stocks", they are "not all perfect or precise" The Only Information we have to use as a reference was written by Walter Roper, early on in Matheis Gagne's stock making Career as far as I know there was Nothing wrote by The Gagne's meaning Albert or his Father Matheis on standards or changes made during the period of when these stocks were made.
Walter Roper "made no mention in his Books about Matheis's son Albert working for him, but he did".

I feel the reason for that was that Roper's Books were written before Albert came into the scene or became a stock maker in his Father's shop, once these stock's got Popular with The Camp perry shooter's and advertised in magazines Gagne's work load had to be very heavy. If you look close at my K-Frame set {Shown Again below} which has the date scribed in the rear and the square Peg holes "their checking panel border's differ". So, does that mean they are not Original Roper stocks? To me of course not, they were hand made "from free hand Pencil tracing's" and each panel may not be dead perfect in it's borders, diamond placement and such, as I feel my Later made -N-Frame stock's are lacking those Square Peg Jig holes that seem to be the focus or Gagne Tell Tale Trade Mark left in their work. Albert who came later in the stock making for his Father may have come up with a different Jig holding idea that did not leave behind these square Peg holes is my feeling as the checking, Borders and shape of my Larger frame pair is exact to what the smaller K-Frame pair is.
As Keith Brown has shared with me, and I Respect his findings and Vast experiences with viewing Roper examples and making his own to Roper's standard's he has seen some other Pairs of Roper's stock's with "noticeable differences in the placement of the diamonds, checking borders as well as some Missing these square Peg Jig holes" like mine are in his past, so I feel it is safe to say there were changes that came after Walter Roper wrote those book's by other stock makers that worked in Matheis Gagne's shop.
I do know that my Great Uncle used to make Custom hand built and crafted Grandfather & Grandmother Clocks for a living and sold them when they were completed to the general public. He found different ways to make them that saved him time so he changed his work ethics and tell tale custom clock cabinet maker signs over time as well. He also got less Precise in his design's and normal work habits as his age wore on as he made them up until he was 96 Years old and since he started out making them when he was 70 you could see subtle differences in his embellishments as he got older, his tedious finished product precise eye appeal changed some due to his age and perhaps his failing eye sight, so perhaps Gagne's work differed due to his age as well. We have to remember all of his stocks were hand made so that to me says there is no exact Patterns or ways he used when making them, that is what makes them so unique.... as we have seen they can and will Differ, no matter what the Books Say, The Man was Human and we all fall short of Being Perfect, no matter what the Task is ...