Model of 1989

I enjoy my ACP revolvers but have to admit, I have never tried a Model 1988 or Model 1989. Don't see the need for the underlug for the ACP round. Heck, a couple of mine don't even have the shrouded ejector rod! Maybe I need to get on of the heavy ones to see what the fuss is about.

Kevin

The added weight of the heavy barrel and full lug helps steady the gun. I almost always shoot paper targets at 25 (sometimes 50) yards in a bullseye, one handed stance using single-action. A Model 22 .45 ACP / Auto Rim, by comparison, has the lighter partial shroud only and the lighter barrel. Its shoots well and is probably as accurate as the 625s, but I find it more difficult to steady when shooting bullseye style.

Firing double-action using two hands, one would likely notice a difference in "shootability" between the heavier and lighter guns, but it may not be significant, depending on the shooter and skill level.
 
The added weight of the heavy barrel and full lug helps steady the gun. I almost always shoot paper targets at 25 (sometimes 50) yards in a bullseye, one handed stance using single-action. A Model 22 .45 ACP / Auto Rim, by comparison, has the lighter partial shroud only and the lighter barrel. Its shoots well and is probably as accurate as the 625s, but I find it more difficult to steady when shooting bullseye style.

Firing double-action using two hands, one would likely notice a difference in "shootability" between the heavier and lighter guns, but it may not be significant, depending on the shooter and skill level.

Thank you.

My PPC revolver was a Davis built one with the slab sided barrel and matching underlug. I found it heavy for the cartridge but a joy to compete with.

I may have to find one of the full lugged ACP and try it.

Kevin
 
I really like my newer 625-8 JM. Use Rimz poly moon clips for range. No tools needed! {do have tools and metal clips also} It is a good shooter in my book Bob
 

Attachments

  • kitchen again 006.jpg
    kitchen again 006.jpg
    151.5 KB · Views: 16
  • kitchen again 004.jpg
    kitchen again 004.jpg
    150.4 KB · Views: 17
  • P1050785.jpg
    P1050785.jpg
    137 KB · Views: 15
  • P1050788.jpg
    P1050788.jpg
    121.5 KB · Views: 14
As long as we're sharing 45acp revolvers, here are three of my five. I also have 1917 guns in both Colt and S&W flavors. The BMT moon clip tool is something I wouldn't be without.
 

Attachments

  • 20200915_115055.jpg
    20200915_115055.jpg
    191.1 KB · Views: 21
  • 20200219_091712.jpg
    20200219_091712.jpg
    95.2 KB · Views: 16
  • 20210113_082025.jpg
    20210113_082025.jpg
    141.3 KB · Views: 27
As long as we're sharing 45acp revolvers, here are three of my five. I also have 1917 guns in both Colt and S&W flavors. The BMT moon clip tool is something I wouldn't be without.

sodacan,

In the photograph of the two blued revolvers, one is a Model 1950 and the other is a Model 1955, I believe.

I tried enlarging the photo to read the barrel stamping on the bottom revolver. It blurred, what does it say please? Is it off center?

Thanks,

Kevin
 
1955 on top. 1950 on bottom. Everything is exactly where it should be.
Says "45 CAL MODEL 1950". The 1950 is a rare all target version, all original.
 
Last edited:
I love both of mine, a 3" (625-3) and 5" (625-2), I use both standard brass with moon clips and 45AR. I often carry my 3" as my EDC.
 

Attachments

  • 9660FB77-7AAA-41E4-A627-EEF73083AB09.jpeg
    9660FB77-7AAA-41E4-A627-EEF73083AB09.jpeg
    96.3 KB · Views: 7
  • 7670AE0E-C1B5-49BF-BB23-5FC36327DE7D.jpeg
    7670AE0E-C1B5-49BF-BB23-5FC36327DE7D.jpeg
    117.2 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
Well here is mine…..one of my favorites.
2308410f040b69e4897f3656e1aed1db.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top