I don't know if it is a Spanish copy of a Smith. However, for the price I bought it for, that would not bother me.
I bought it to shoot, not collect and because it was different looking.
The hammer is difinitely a later addition. When the screw at the end of the plate is tightened the hammer drags, badly. I would guess a 1917 hammer is thinner.
The barrel is marked S&W DA 45 and the numbers on the barrel and cyclinder are the same. However, there are no other Smith and Wesson marks or logos on this piece.
As you can see from the pictures, the internals look like any other Smith and Wesson I've cleaned but I have never had anything other than J, K, and L frames apart to clean.
The rifling of the barrel starts right at the part where there is usually a forcing cone.
I'll shoot it this weekend and let you know how it goes and if I still have all my fingers when I'm done.

The hammer is difinitely a later addition. When the screw at the end of the plate is tightened the hammer drags, badly. I would guess a 1917 hammer is thinner.
The barrel is marked S&W DA 45 and the numbers on the barrel and cyclinder are the same. However, there are no other Smith and Wesson marks or logos on this piece.
As you can see from the pictures, the internals look like any other Smith and Wesson I've cleaned but I have never had anything other than J, K, and L frames apart to clean.
The rifling of the barrel starts right at the part where there is usually a forcing cone.
I'll shoot it this weekend and let you know how it goes and if I still have all my fingers when I'm done.
