I posted recently about buying a 1973 Model 28-2 and an early 1979 Dan Wesson Model 22 (.22 LR) from a friend's recently inherited collection. The Dan Wesson is my first ever and I probably wouldn't have bought it but he gave me such a deal I couldn't pass it up. I knew about the famous Pistol Packs from back in the 70s and 80s, but as a S&W guy I never gave the DWs much consideration. I actually kind of like this Model 22, although it's much heavier than a K-22 (Model 17) and the action is not nearly as smooth. There are actually more differences between DWs and S&Ws than I realized. The one-piece DW stocks and internal grip post are cool, but the manufacture and checkering is a little rough. The forward mounted cylinder release is OK, except I can see that quick reloads would take practice. Additionally, the cylinder/crane cannot be removed without taking off the left sideplate (2 screws) and removing a latch spring clip. It's also a Colt-style clockwise cylinder rotation. The barrel nut, shroud, and barrel removal are all very easy with the supplied wrench, and easily reassembled with the included barrel-to-cylinder gap shim (mandatory for barrel installation). Lucky for me this Model 22 was basically ANIB, so the barrel nut unscrewed with little effort...there are horror stories about trying to get a frozen or gummed up barrel nut loose. The design of the mainspring assy. is also interesting but I like the S&W designs better. I have looked online to see if there were any extra DW .22 barrels for sale (2-1/2", 4", 8") but they are basically unobtainium. All in all, this DW seems like a robust and dependable revolver and I'll get it out to the range very soon. I can see why there are die hard Dan Wesson fans, but personally I still prefer my S&Ws. Enjoy!