And these are the folks that are supposed to be paying my social security and healthcare in a few years.....sigh.....
Well, no.
The people who will be supporting your social security stipends will never appear in news stories because they don't do anything dumb, tragic or criminal enough to constitute "news" in the minds of the potato heads who pump out the information they are certain we want to know. The future productive members of our society are invisible on a daily basis because they are focused, learning, and already forming the habits of self-reliance and responsibility that winners have always displayed. You know: the very qualities that are commonly taken to be devoid of newsworthiness.
Sometimes, and maybe even most of the time, we need to look at evidence backwards to see what it is we really need to understand from a situation. Remember Sherlock Holmes and the curious incident of the dog in the night.
"But Holmes, the dog did nothing in the night."
"That was the curious incident."
There's an old WWII story about an officer in a post-mission briefing who was talking to pilots about a study of damage on returned bombers and fighters. "Worry not," said this guy, who was clearly one of the first wartime statistics guys. "We have identified those areas of a plane where damage is most often observed, and we are going to be armoring and reinforcing those areas on all aircraft."
This prompted a question from one of the pilots: "But sir, wouldn't it make more sense to armor the areas where you
don't see flak damage and bullet holes? Because that's where the planes were hit that didn't make it back."
I don't always live up to my own advice, but I try never miss a chance to question what I think I know.