Just bought a new 4" 617. I am an old guy not new to SW rimfire revolvers and own several others at this time. I shoot them a LOT (backyard range). This is the first one that leads the bore, and it does so badly .
The amount varies by brand of ammo, but seems worse with my favorite CCI Minimags. Minimags generally give folks the least trouble with leading. The problem with the leading seems to be at the forward section of the forcing cone and the first little bit of rifled bore, and it appears worse at the 5 to 7 o'clock portion of the bore. Small sheets of lead come out of the bore with a brush after only 20 rounds! Again, I have zero problems with any of my other SW .22s (34, 35, 63, 18, etc.) leading even after hundreds of rounds. Maybe I have just been lucky with the others.
I have searched several older posts about this issue and many folks seem to say it is common (not to me!) and live with it, others give hints on cleaning the lead out (shouldn't have to), and a few say send it back to Smith.
Am I wrong to wanting Smith to work on this forcing cone issue, or just live with?
The amount varies by brand of ammo, but seems worse with my favorite CCI Minimags. Minimags generally give folks the least trouble with leading. The problem with the leading seems to be at the forward section of the forcing cone and the first little bit of rifled bore, and it appears worse at the 5 to 7 o'clock portion of the bore. Small sheets of lead come out of the bore with a brush after only 20 rounds! Again, I have zero problems with any of my other SW .22s (34, 35, 63, 18, etc.) leading even after hundreds of rounds. Maybe I have just been lucky with the others.
I have searched several older posts about this issue and many folks seem to say it is common (not to me!) and live with it, others give hints on cleaning the lead out (shouldn't have to), and a few say send it back to Smith.
Am I wrong to wanting Smith to work on this forcing cone issue, or just live with?