To answer your question NO! They added a more aggressive grip, front slide serrations and a slightly improved trigger. The resale of the 1.0 is in the toilet because everyone wanted a 2.0. KEEP your 1.0 !
I had a 1.0 and loved it but due to aging hands with arthritis I sold it at a considerable loss.
I purchased the 9mm EZ and shot 40 rounds (mixture of +P & reg.Velocity) through it. I would never go back to the Shield even if I Could. The EZ has better balance, feels better in the hand, and just like the ads say it’s easier to rack the slide, load the magazine etc... JMO
Be SAFE and Shoot Ofter!
I suggest that you consider a Shield 45. All Shield 45s are 2.0. I have a Shield 9 1.0 with nearly 6,000 rounds through it, and a Shield 45 with over 7,000 rounds through it, so I have a good basis for comparison. The Shield 45 is a vastly more accurate gun. It's even more accurate than my SIG P320 compact. At 15 yards, I can place 70-80% of my shots into a 4"x4" square with the 45 (two-handed, unsupported). With the 9, I average only about 45%. The recoil from the 45 is surprisingly mild considering its size. If you don't mind shooting .45 acp, and you don't mind giving up a round, it's a much better gun. If your local range has one for rent, try it. I think you'll like it.
I've agreed with you on everything until now. I'm sorry, but two handguns really aren't enoughWent a different route. Decided that two hand guns were enough so I got a rifle instead.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I've agreed with you on everything until now. I'm sorry, but two handguns really aren't enough![]()