SoulLessGinger
Member
Just picked up a low mileage S&W 1006. I'd tell you how much but I'm new here, and don't want you guys to start off hating me
After function testing it and taking it to the range for a test fire (everything works as it should), the first thing I did when I got it home was detail strip it to bare frame and slide. I know the gun's history pretty well and know the previous owner didn't fire it much (rheumatoid arthritis). Once inside, it looked about how I expected it to. Here she is buck naked:
Let me start by saying that I am a tinkerer and a pretty fair home gunsmith, but by no means a pro. Also, when I buy a gun, half the fun of having it for me is messing with it and getting it smooth and running the way I want.
The first time I disassembled it was not easy...at all, but I got through it ok. Definitely not for the faint of heart. I did some light stoning/polishing on the trigger bar and it's cutout in the frame, polished the firing pin and its channel, and all the other safe spots one would hit in trigger job (didn't mess with the hammer or sear angles or even polish anything on their engagement surfaces). Also removed the ejector depressor since this will be a range gun only, and won't be pulling any HD or CCW duty.
I also dressed a massive burr that was making the mag release gritty.
A few concerns, though, maybe you guys can help me with:
1. The safety/de-cocker is gritty as hell. Not smooth in the least. The safety/de-cocker barrel and the whole area of the slide that it rides in is very roughly machined. Is there anything I can do about it? Or should I just live with it.
2. The recoil spring is about an inch longer than the #20lb spring that came with the Wilson spring kit I ordered for it. I would have expected an 18lb spring to be shorter, especially after all this time in storage. Is that normal, or is this an aftermarket spring. Also, the mainspring looks different than the other springs in the gun (it's bright and shiny) is it possible this is an aftermarket spring as well.
3. The exterior of the gun is flawless, but inside, the machining in general is kind of rough. And the tool marks on the hammer face and breechface are like nothing I've seen this side of a Makarov. Is this normal? Would stoning those areas be worthwhile (they don't seem to affect function at all).
I have a few other more serious issues with the hammer strut and extractor that I found, but those will have to be a topic for another day as this post is too long already and it's getting late. Thanks in advance.



After function testing it and taking it to the range for a test fire (everything works as it should), the first thing I did when I got it home was detail strip it to bare frame and slide. I know the gun's history pretty well and know the previous owner didn't fire it much (rheumatoid arthritis). Once inside, it looked about how I expected it to. Here she is buck naked:

Let me start by saying that I am a tinkerer and a pretty fair home gunsmith, but by no means a pro. Also, when I buy a gun, half the fun of having it for me is messing with it and getting it smooth and running the way I want.
The first time I disassembled it was not easy...at all, but I got through it ok. Definitely not for the faint of heart. I did some light stoning/polishing on the trigger bar and it's cutout in the frame, polished the firing pin and its channel, and all the other safe spots one would hit in trigger job (didn't mess with the hammer or sear angles or even polish anything on their engagement surfaces). Also removed the ejector depressor since this will be a range gun only, and won't be pulling any HD or CCW duty.
I also dressed a massive burr that was making the mag release gritty.
A few concerns, though, maybe you guys can help me with:
1. The safety/de-cocker is gritty as hell. Not smooth in the least. The safety/de-cocker barrel and the whole area of the slide that it rides in is very roughly machined. Is there anything I can do about it? Or should I just live with it.
2. The recoil spring is about an inch longer than the #20lb spring that came with the Wilson spring kit I ordered for it. I would have expected an 18lb spring to be shorter, especially after all this time in storage. Is that normal, or is this an aftermarket spring. Also, the mainspring looks different than the other springs in the gun (it's bright and shiny) is it possible this is an aftermarket spring as well.
3. The exterior of the gun is flawless, but inside, the machining in general is kind of rough. And the tool marks on the hammer face and breechface are like nothing I've seen this side of a Makarov. Is this normal? Would stoning those areas be worthwhile (they don't seem to affect function at all).
I have a few other more serious issues with the hammer strut and extractor that I found, but those will have to be a topic for another day as this post is too long already and it's getting late. Thanks in advance.

Last edited: