Scuds03
Member
- Joined
- Jun 5, 2010
- Messages
- 495
- Reaction score
- 17
That mount looks sweet dude. Sorry for the thread jacking we got going on over cheap scopes haha. Post up some pics when you get it all in!
New Scope
- Thread starter dezmick
- Start date
That mount looks sweet dude. Sorry for the thread jacking we got going on over cheap scopes haha. Post up some pics when you get it all in!
Not a big deal that is what forums are for, so people can voice there opinions on topics, all i know is i looked through the scope and really like the optics and it is made for the AR platform so i decided to get it, and yes it is a lot of money for a scope but heck i have already put a lot into my 15-22 so what is a little more going to do right!
TAKticool
Member
- Joined
- Jul 14, 2010
- Messages
- 42
- Reaction score
- 0
Yeah I had the same problem, people on here get so upset when people want to discuss optics, sheesh... Half the people tell you if you don't have an inexpensive PA microdot you're an idiot, the other half tell you if you don't have an ACOG or Leupold scope fit for the M82 you're an idiot...
I just think ppl should be free to do their thing, if you want inexpensive thats cool, If you want nice(nicer) or more quality-expensive then cool, show off... Maybe some people (like me?) have no other fancier/bigger rifle with which to use a high-quality optic and want to enjoy something nice on something nice (nice optic, nice .22LR rifle in the 15-22)
I just don't see why to get so angry over optics.
I just think ppl should be free to do their thing, if you want inexpensive thats cool, If you want nice(nicer) or more quality-expensive then cool, show off... Maybe some people (like me?) have no other fancier/bigger rifle with which to use a high-quality optic and want to enjoy something nice on something nice (nice optic, nice .22LR rifle in the 15-22)
I just don't see why to get so angry over optics.
No anger on my end. If I had the money I'd put a real M3 in a LaRue mount on my 15-22, with a bigger piece of glass for distance shooting. With my current budget I'd rather spend my spare cash on ammo rather than buying a great optic and only being able to look at it.
It will definitely be pretty awesome to see something else mounted on these rifles than what most people have.
It will definitely be pretty awesome to see something else mounted on these rifles than what most people have.
grimreaper21
Member
Nice I was actually recommended the SWFA SSALT, very similar, $10 cheaper and the inserts can change from 1'' or 30mm incase you have multiple scopes. SWFA SWFA SS Mounts SWFA SS AR Tacitcal Mounts
Sorry, browsing in the iPad, didn't check the link ... One can imagine with all the PA fanboys on the net how i came to the conclusion I did.
There are a variety of good scopes that don't cost a fortune from nikon, swift, burr is, etc
There are a variety of good scopes that don't cost a fortune from nikon, swift, burr is, etc
ST33L3RS
Member
I got a Redfield Revolution 3x9 40mm, what rings will work for this scope? The main tube is 1" I gotta send back the brownells 30mm flat top mounts,they wont fit the rings are to big. Any suggestions or advice would help thanx.
grimreaper21
Member
With a little math this is the perfect way to do it
(stolen from the 'bad guys' and modified by me)
Measure the outside diameter of your scope's objective, then divide that by two.
Scope has an O.D. of 50mm. 50/2=25mm (.98")
or an OD of 40mm, 40/2 = 20mm.
This will be the dimension above which the ring and bases combined will need to raise the scope's centerline to clear a barrel that is the same diameter as the action..
Once you have that key dimension, all you need to do is select a base and ring combination that equals that dimension plus 3mm-5mm to accommodate lens covers.
25mm+3mm=28mm (1.10")
20mm+3mm=23mm (.90'')
Now you need rings which will take up the rest of the dimension. This is where you need to pay attention because this is where most of the confusion and inconsistencies come from. Manufacturer's ring heights are not uniform from brand to brand, IE: Burris' low is not the same as Leupold's low. Ignore their descriptions and go by the actual measurement of the ring. Usually found on their website. The actual measurement of "ring height" is determined two different ways. Some measure from the top of the base (where the ring contacts it) to the centerline of the ring (Fig. A). If you have Figure A you are done, just compare it to the number calculated earlier, you want it to be just a bit more than this number for clearance. Others measure from the top of the base to where the ring first contacts the scope (Fig. B).
If the brand you are considering measures their ring height like Fig. B, you will need to add 12.7mm for a one inch scope and 15mm for 30mm scopes to get to the centerline of the ring. Add the number to the B. Figure given. you can use google.com and type in the search bar for example ".60in+12.7mm to in", as a quick easy calculator. Once again make sure the ring is ever so slightly higher than your previously calculated number. (ie. with a measurement of 23mm or .90'', don't get .890'' rings.)
(stolen from the 'bad guys' and modified by me)
Measure the outside diameter of your scope's objective, then divide that by two.
Scope has an O.D. of 50mm. 50/2=25mm (.98")
or an OD of 40mm, 40/2 = 20mm.
This will be the dimension above which the ring and bases combined will need to raise the scope's centerline to clear a barrel that is the same diameter as the action..
Once you have that key dimension, all you need to do is select a base and ring combination that equals that dimension plus 3mm-5mm to accommodate lens covers.
25mm+3mm=28mm (1.10")
20mm+3mm=23mm (.90'')
Now you need rings which will take up the rest of the dimension. This is where you need to pay attention because this is where most of the confusion and inconsistencies come from. Manufacturer's ring heights are not uniform from brand to brand, IE: Burris' low is not the same as Leupold's low. Ignore their descriptions and go by the actual measurement of the ring. Usually found on their website. The actual measurement of "ring height" is determined two different ways. Some measure from the top of the base (where the ring contacts it) to the centerline of the ring (Fig. A). If you have Figure A you are done, just compare it to the number calculated earlier, you want it to be just a bit more than this number for clearance. Others measure from the top of the base to where the ring first contacts the scope (Fig. B).
If the brand you are considering measures their ring height like Fig. B, you will need to add 12.7mm for a one inch scope and 15mm for 30mm scopes to get to the centerline of the ring. Add the number to the B. Figure given. you can use google.com and type in the search bar for example ".60in+12.7mm to in", as a quick easy calculator. Once again make sure the ring is ever so slightly higher than your previously calculated number. (ie. with a measurement of 23mm or .90'', don't get .890'' rings.)
Last edited:
ST33L3RS
Member
Sorry I'm lost -_- I failed math, anybody else using this scope on their rifle? and what rings are you using thanx. thank you for trying to help grimreaper.
john16443
Member
I'm assuming this is the scope you bought:
Redfield Revolution 3-9x40mm Riflescope - Matte Finish, 4-Plex / Accu-Range Reticle FREE S&H 67090, 67095. Redfield Riflescopes.
The main tube is 1" OD, so 1" scope rings should work. Rings similar to these are what I just bought:
NcSTAR Scope Ring - 1" Weaver Ring RB21. RB21. NcSTAR Riflescope Mounts, Rings & Bases.
That page will also have some risers that you may want (don't necessarily need) to raise the scope off the top rail.
grimreaper21
Member
Just make sure the "A" measurement is .90" or greater. Or if they use the 'B' measurement, .4 inches or greater. Every brand will measure different, check The companys website.
Last edited:
ST33L3RS
Member
yes that's the one, so you think those rings will work? Thanx for all your help.
grimreaper21
Member
you can try it but their website doesn't even tell you what the dimensions are, they just give a height which could be either measurement or even the height of the whole ring. I'd recommend getting picatinny rings instead of weaver rings, because the 15-22 is picatinny standard. weaver fits but, may cause mounting or zeroing issues. if you really want cheapo ncstar rings look on here for what you want. maybe call their customer service and ask how they are measured.
Welcome to NcSTAR
dont forget these numbers.
if you can't find alternatives this page has just about every company that ever made rings.
http://swfa.com/Mounts-Rings-and-Bases-C573.aspx
Welcome to NcSTAR
dont forget these numbers.
if you can't find alternatives this page has just about every company that ever made rings.
http://swfa.com/Mounts-Rings-and-Bases-C573.aspx
Last edited:
grimreaper21
Member
Every brand is different don't recommend based on name. Ie. medium or large
Similar threads
