OK, we were issued the 1006 from 1992-2006 and based upon long experience, I'd like to pass on a couple of items.
Can you tell us who "we" is?
The recoil spring tension of the 1006 was carefully calculated. I'm not sure of the figures on the 1006, but with a 1911, standard recoil spring and hardball, the impact of the slide hitting the frame in recoil was ~700 Gs. The impact of the slide going into battery after stripping a round and feeding it was ~750 Gs. Obviously, if you increase the recoil spring tension, the impact loads go down in recoil, up in feeding.
I would assume S&W engineers ran the calculations in order to design the proper weight of the slide. Who did the 1911 calculations?
I'm not real sure what the stock recoil spring rating is, but I wouldn't go more than a couple pounds over stock and stock would probably be the best choice. But, it's your toy, just realize you're gonna have trouble replacing broken parts.
From everything I've been able to research on the Internet (and it's all true
) Looks like 18 pounds. I'm not one of those users who gets a new gun and starts making changes willy-nilly.
Almost all of my handguns are stock or have had grip changes only.
My SR1911 10mm is the only one with modifications which were carefully researched - and did not involve a recoil spring change.
The original extractor spring is/was p/n 102020000. The upgraded medium extractor spring is/was p/n 235630000. The medium is suggested.