Not to be the "Party Pooper" here, but...

rum_runner

Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2017
Messages
26
Reaction score
36
After reading many of the threads here on the M&P 15....I wonder WHY did you buy one?
Barrel changes. Sights. Mags. Lowers. Trigger pull? 100,000 rounds? Why upgrade?
I understand many people want to "evolve" a weapon to fit their desires. I've scoped more than a few Mausers.
I just want reliable function...accuracy...and lethal.
PLUS available ammo. The M&P fits that requirement. I'm not changing anything.
Had I intended to spend $2000 plus, on an AR....changing/adding parts...I would not have gone with the M&P.
However, for the job intended, I figure it is more than enough.
If not, I have these ratty AK 47's....bountiful 7.62x39 ammo...and know them well....
Still, I like my MP very well....
 
Register to hide this ad
Well every party needs a pooper and that's why we invited you
The Party Pooper

: )
 
I see the same thing with folks and their Ruger 10/22s. Granted there are as many aftermarket things for that as there are for Jeeps, but changing out EVERYTHING except the serialized aluminum receiver shell and then bragging how accurate Ruger rifles are? For what they spent, they could have bought an Anschutz and a lot of expensive Eley target ammo.
 
I bought my Sport to be competitive in IDPA 3 gun.
Shot it stock but later added a better charging handle.
I cant shoot IDPA anymore due to health but I find it to be an excellent 100yd target rifle.
Having been an M1 Garand shooter and reluctant to move into the new century, I am now glad I own the Sport.
Jim
 
Maybes its like buying an old chevelle thats looking a bit rough, needs some work, paint and a few other things..
$$ to get it..
You know you can nickle dime it as you go.


VS.

Going out and buying a nicely fully restored Chevelle with the color you like, rims yada yada.
$$$$$$ you don't have..

why do people buy used homes that needs fixed up, instead of just buying a brand new house exactly how you want it?..

And of course, there are those who just like the Sport II, and the fact that is it a S&W etc, but they want to tweak a few things....
 
Buyers can certainly do as they please with their purchases, but many are probably unaware that a lot of guns are well-designed, accurate and reliable straight from the box.

As for potential resale value, some here say never buy a gun with that in mind. In the realistic world of classified ads, gun shows, Internet auction and sale sites, etc., lots of guns of all kinds are sold and traded quite regularly. The best situation exists where one wants and buys a gun that other people also want now and will continue to want in the future. That is not the same thing as buying for resale. The initial purchase may require a few dollars more than some clone or lesser gun, but it's usually worth it. Their are exceptions, but quite often, unmolested, original condition guns hold value far better than ones that have been modified.
 
Some folks just like to tinker. Some fancy themselves gunsmiths and want to "customize" their rifles, despite the fact that the level of "skill" needed to customize an AR is about equivalent to that required to change light bulbs. But if you really want to see the phenomenon at its absolutely ridiculous height, go over to the Savage owners' site and check out the fellows who buy a $250 Axis then, having heard that the barrel's too skinny, the stock's too flexible, the bolt handle's too small, and the trigger is awful -- and without even firing the gun -- go out and spend $1500 to convert it in to a "long-range tackdriver" that often doesn't shoot any better than my two stock examples -- which out of the box are exactly what they are meant to be -- inexpensive, accurate hunters.

If you have the money to burn, be my guest, but to me it makes better sense to spend it on a gun specifically built for the purpose you want to use it for, and not expect to be able to turn a sow's ear in to a silk purse.
 
I'm not changing anything.
Oh, that's a good one!
tenor.gif


Nothing? Not one thing? Surely there's something you'll change. I've never met anyone that hasn't changed something. AR's are like Harley's. They all come from the factory the same, but you'll never find two the same on the street.

You'll change something. It might just be an optic or a grip, but something's changing. It's the nature of the beast.
 
When I bought my Sport II, it was everything I could ask for and fit the budget. Yes, I've made changes. However, some were due to the fact that I refuse to register it as an assault weapon-new state laws. So it now wears a fixed stock, has a fin grip instead of the pistol grip, and the flash hider was replaced with a comp. Since I've gone featureless, the stupid bullet button was replaced with a normal mag release. And because of the grip, replaced the normal safety with an ambi one.

As far as other changes, they were done to fit me better. The stock fore-end was replaced because it didn't feel right. Replaced the stock trigger, which wasn't bad, for an after market one, because I'm used to tuned 3lb 1911 triggers. Finally, been wearing bifocals for a good 30yrs and iron sights just don't work. So, now it wears a scope.
 
I bought mine for enjoyment, just like my motorcycles and cars and trucks.

If your happy with your stock rifle and stock motorcycles and cars then you probably save a lot of money.

I'm retired and buy guns as a hobby, and like everything I own, They get the full treatment of customization to my wants.

Even though I have changed most of the parts on my sport II it is still the budget beater rifle of my collection, for anyone that owns one and thinks it's the best rifle out as is than I'm happy for them.

What I never understood is why anyone would be so concerned at why someone else wants to spend their money on their rifle.

Quit AR shaming us already.
 
I bought mine because it was the quickest and cheapest way to get started on the AR platform and learn how they worked. I knew when I bought it that I would use it to experiment and find out what other options and changes I wanted. I also had two ulterior motives: I wanted a SHTF tactical defense weapon, and I also wanted an accurate, sub 30cal round to hunt coyotes with. I ended up putting my Sport II back to stock, other than a couple quick mount goodies, and it is my SHTF weapon. I built a second AR-15 to do my coyote killing. It has many of the modifications I realized I wanted after buying my S2 such as free float hand guard, 1/7 barrel, BDC scope, and some other bolt-on accessories.
 
After reading many of the threads here on the M&P 15....I wonder WHY did you buy one?
Barrel changes. Sights. Mags. Lowers. Trigger pull? 100,000 rounds? Why upgrade?
I understand many people want to "evolve" a weapon to fit their desires. I've scoped more than a few Mausers.
I just want reliable function...accuracy...and lethal.
PLUS available ammo. The M&P fits that requirement. I'm not changing anything.
Had I intended to spend $2000 plus, on an AR....changing/adding parts...I would not have gone with the M&P.
However, for the job intended, I figure it is more than enough.
If not, I have these ratty AK 47's....bountiful 7.62x39 ammo...and know them well....
Still, I like my MP very well....

I wouldn't consider this post any big party-pooper. I was expecting a rant on a rifle that crapped the bed, and S&W wouldn't stand by it, or something like that.
I think the OP is making a fair point, and one that applies across the spectrum, not just to M&P Sports.
Gun owners largely DO seem to have this irrational obsession with goobering up their toys with expensive, often un-neccessary extras, often defeating the purpose of the budget weapon they bought in the first place.
But, that being said, there are degrees of upgrades, and not all of them are over-the-top, complete overhauls.
Personally I think these rifles benefit heavily from replacing that rinky,abrasive, all-plastic handguard with a Magpul guard.
They're vastly more comfortable and ergonomic, provide greater surface area for the supporting hand, and are heat shielded. And, they ain't real expensive.
Also, the rifle benefits from one of those rubber Tapco slip-on buttplate covers. Obviously recoil isn't an issue, but these little rubber Tapco units add more surface area to the stock buttplate, rounding out the uncomfortable corners, and shouldering much more comfortable and effectively.
They're solidly constructed, stay on very well,and for the mere $10 they cost, they're a very worthy upgrade for these plastic M4 type stocks, IMO. Try one and I'm sure you'll agree.
Other than these, I think the rifle is exccellent, as is, and the OP is correct: if you feel gotta change out half the rifle, you shoulda just bought a higher-end gun. ;)
 
Last edited:
Buy a bargain, entry level rifle and put premium parts on it? I understand changing grips and furniture that better fits your hand, but $200 triggers, free float rails, etc... on a Sport/Sport II makes no sense to me. This is not to be confused with their standard "non Sport" line. The OR, T, X, models are as good as anything out there in their price range.
 
Yeah I bought mine as a first AR. I love shooting it!
I did put a Magpul hand guard on it. I am looking at a slip on rubber stock of some sort to add. I did get a RDS to maybe put on it, but I may save it for my next AR.
I want a mid length, with a different barrel twist and a FA bolt.....really some upgraded parts from the Sport 2.
Just for kicks and giggles really and maybe some deer hunting.

To sum it up, I got a smoking deal on the Sport 2, that combined with the warranty and company I just had to do it!

Glad I did!
 
Back
Top