I don't remember Lucas McCain shooting a Mosin Nagant!

Exactly why I still drive my old 67 camaro around on the weekends. Because all the kids on the block have those cool looking new camaros. But mine seems to get way more attention. Even attention from those new camaro owners who keep slapping themselves for buying that new one lol.
![]()
If you've held both a Mosin Nagant and a Classic Winchester, and do not see the difference, I'm not sure I can help.
Lotta snarky comments, but I have a thick skin. Yep, I've held both rifles and if I closed my eyes I bet I couldn't tell the difference in weight. And, hey, I can shoot pretty good groups with the Mosin from 100 yards with iron sights. Plus the ammo is cheap. Yep, agree Winchester is American as apple pie while the Mosin is Ruskie through and through. But my original point was value for the money. You can buy a Mosin and still have $1,500 left over for a good weekend in Vegas.
I tell my art history students there are five factors in determining the monetary value of art.
1. Age (older is generally better).
2. Scarcity...how many made or surviving?
3. Quality. Good is always good and better than bad.
4. Who did it? A painting by Rembrandt van Rijn will sell for more than one by Joe Smith.
5. "The Story" This explains why Vincent van Gogh's paintings sell for so much. They aren't that old, he produced about 2,000 of them so not scarce, I don't think they are all that good, but the tragic story of the suffering artist makes collectors want his work.
So let's look at this rifle.
1. 1889. Pretty old for a modern firearm.
2. Yes, they made lots of these, but how many survive in good condition? You don't see a nice original 1873 at every show.
3. Winchester is recognized as a quality name. One of the biggest, in fact.
4. See #3 response. Winchester made good stuff. They are revered by many.
5. The history of the brand name. The Old West. The movies. C'mon...pure Americana.
What am I missing?
Good points. Guns are made to be shot, IMHO, and therefore I prefer a shooter over a collectible. I'm not without sentiment but when it comes to firearms I see them as useful tools, like any other, and generally not "works of art," although some of the old Berettas and other classics fit this category. I wouldn't put a Win 73 in this category, however, given that so many were made and largely mass-produced despite the inherent craftsmanship.This reminds me of another thread here in the lounge.
Let's compare this to artwork. To me, a Renoir isn't any more appealing than a dogs playing poker print.
Many other people do not feel this way.
In this vein, I can see where you are coming from. Some people look at a gun as a tool. Others see a precious work of art. I fall into the second category. You likely fall into the first.
With artwork, I see something that will cover a bad spot in the drywall. Other people see much more.
That's why they make a variety of stuff; to try and cater to us all.
I don't remember Lucas McCain shooting a Mosin Nagant!![]()
This reminds me of another thread here in the lounge.
Let's compare this to artwork. To me, a Renoir isn't any more appealing than a dogs playing poker print.
Many other people do not feel this way.
In this vein, I can see where you are coming from. Some people look at a gun as a tool. Others see a precious work of art. I fall into the second category. You likely fall into the first.
With artwork, I see something that will cover a bad spot in the drywall. Other people see much more.
That's why they make a variety of stuff; to try and cater to us all.
Fabrage eggs, vodka, ballet dancers musicians, athletes chess players, guns, mail order brides & strippers, weapons grade plutonium?
and you can keep the rest.strippers, weapons grade plutonium